News & Analysis as of

Putative Class Actions Time-Barred Claims

A&O Shearman

Southern District Of New York Dismisses Securities Act Claims As Untimely And Pares Claims In Putative Class Action Against...

A&O Shearman on

On November 4, 2024, Judge Denise L. Cote of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York granted in part and denied in part a motion to dismiss a putative class action brought under Sections 10b-5...more

A&O Shearman

Southern District Of New York Dismisses Putative Class Action Against Mining Company As Time-Barred And For Failure To Adequately...

A&O Shearman on

On June 3, 2019, Judge Analisa Torres of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York dismissed a putative class action against the mining company Rio Tinto and certain of its executives. Colbert v....more

Carlton Fields

UCL and Financial Elder Abuse Claims Against Life Insurer Are Time-Barred

Carlton Fields on

Life insurers in California are all too familiar with claims based on alleged violations of senior notice statutes and financial elder abuse. ...more

Carlton Fields

Following Cunningham, Pennsylvania District Court Finds Captive Reinsurance Putative Class Action Claims Are Time-Barred

Carlton Fields on

In this putative class action, plaintiffs alleged unlawful practices related to mortgage insurance practices, including a violation of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act of 1974 (“RESPA”). ...more

Carlton Fields

Based on Principles of Fairness, Court Dismisses Putative Class Action RICO Claims Asserted Years After Initiation of Suit

Carlton Fields on

In Robertson v. SunLife Financial, a federal district court in Louisiana dismissed with prejudice as time-barred an amended putative class action complaint alleging RICO and state racketeering claims related to alleged...more

Carlton Fields

Ninth Circuit Expands American Pipe Tolling to Subsequent Securities Class Action by Unnamed Class Members, but Leaves Related...

Carlton Fields on

The Ninth Circuit in Resh v. China Agritech, Inc., No. 15-55432, 2017 WL 2261024 (9th Cir. May 24, 2017), revived the third successive putative shareholder class action against a fertilizer manufacturer after the district...more

6 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide