News & Analysis as of

Regulatory Takings Eminent Domain Land Parcels

Nossaman LLP

What Constitutes a “Larger Parcel?”

Nossaman LLP on

In California, a fundamental principle of eminent domain law is that an owner of property acquired by eminent domain is entitled to just compensation for the property interests taken (Code Civ. Proc. §1263.010)....more

Farrell Fritz, P.C.

Property Owner’s Request for Court-Determined Just Compensation Backfires

Farrell Fritz, P.C. on

The facts at issue in Elpa Builders, Inc. v. State of New York are relatively straightforward.  The property owner (the “Owner”) owned a 53,645-square-foot parcel of property (the “Property”) along New York State Route 347...more

McNees Wallace & Nurick LLC

Murr v. Wisconsin: Defining the Property Affected by a Regulatory Taking

The Supreme Court of the United States recently decided the case Murr v. Wisconsin, No. 15-214 (June 23, 2017), which laid out a new test for determining whether separate parcels of land should be evaluated as a single parcel...more

Stinson LLP

U.S. Supreme Court to Decide "Critical Question" in Eminent Domain

Stinson LLP on

This summer, the U.S. Supreme Court will decide a critical question that will determine whether some landowners will receive compensation from regulations that restrict the uses of their land. The case, Murr v. Wisconsin, may...more

Stinson LLP

U.S. Supreme Court to Decide "Critical Question" in Eminent Domain

Stinson LLP on

This summer, the U.S. Supreme Court will decide a critical question that will determine whether some landowners will receive compensation for regulations that restrict the uses of their land. The case, Murr v. Wisconsin, may...more

5 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide