News & Analysis as of

Reversal Bench Trial

Morrison & Foerster LLP - Class Dismissed

California Supreme Court: Civil Penalty Claims Brought By Government Under UCl And FAL Should Be Determined By Court—Not Jury

The California Supreme Court has confirmed that claims for civil penalties brought by government entities under California’s Unfair Competition Law (“UCL”) and False Advertising Law (“FAL”) should be decided by a judge—not a...more

Knobbe Martens

Examiner Amendments Can Trigger Prosecution History Estoppel

Knobbe Martens on

Amgen, Inc. v. Amneal Pharmas. LLC et al - Before Newman, Lourie, and Taranto.  Appeal from the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware. Summary: An examiner amendment may give rise to prosecution history...more

McDermott Will & Emery

In the Pink: Lack of Personal Jurisdiction Results in Dismissal of Non-Infringement Verdict

McDermott Will & Emery on

Addressing personal jurisdiction in a declaratory judgment action, the US Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit reversed the district court’s bench trial verdict, finding that the district court lacked specific personal...more

Nossaman LLP

Judge Should Consider Constitutionality of a Dedication Requirement, Not the Jury

Nossaman LLP on

Every year or so, a new appellate court decision comes out addressing the proper role of the judge versus the jury on some certain eminent domain issue. Most recently, a trial court, appellate court and the California Supreme...more

4 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide