News & Analysis as of

Reversal Court of Federal Claims

Woods Rogers

Federal Circuit Adopts Narrow Definition of “Printing” to Avoid Constitutional Separation of Powers Question

Woods Rogers on

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit recently reversed a bid protest decision appealed from the Court of Federal Claims after the protester raised a constitutional question.  In Veterans4You LLC v. United States,...more

Morrison & Foerster LLP - Federal Circuitry

Last Week in the Federal Circuit (August 10-14): Clear Skies for Boeing After No-Waiver Ruling

Last week was apparently CFC week at the Federal Circuit, with several precedential decisions in government contracts and Tucker Act cases. Below we give our usual week’s statistics and case of the week—our highly subjective...more

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP

Federal Circuit Revives Key Case Addressing Contractor’s Ability to Include Offsets in Measurement of CAS Change Impacts

Case remanded to Court of Federal Claims to clarify whether CAS Impact Calculation involving multiple unilateral changes may include contractor “offsets” Federal Circuit revives the question of whether the FAR 33.606...more

Morgan Lewis

High Court Checks Government in Risk Corridors Case

Morgan Lewis on

In Maine Community, the US Supreme Court found on April 27, 2020, that the Risk Corridors program created by Congress was a “money-mandating obligation” requiring the federal government to make payments under Section 1342 of...more

Ballard Spahr LLP

Health Insurance Exchanges: A $12B Judgment

Ballard Spahr LLP on

The U.S. Supreme Court has determined that the federal government must pay over $12 billion to certain health insurers that participated in health insurance exchanges in the first three years that those exchanges were in...more

Akerman LLP - Health Law Rx

SCOTUS Rules Government Must Pay $12 Billion to Unprofitable ACA Insurers

Despite Congress’ efforts to use riders to neutralize a provision of the Affordable Care Act (ACA or Act), the Federal government (Government) owes certain insurers $12 billion....more

Troutman Pepper

Supreme Court Finds Insurers Entitled To Millions In ACA Payments

Troutman Pepper on

On April 27, the U.S. Supreme Court held that the federal government is on the hook for $12 billion it failed to pay insurers under the Affordable Care Act (ACA) risk-mitigation program known as the Risk Corridors Program. ...more

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP

Supreme Court Issues Long Awaited Ruling on Affordable Care Act Risk Corridors Program

The Supreme Court issued a long-awaited ruling on April 27, 2020, directed at a more than $12 billion challenge related to the temporary risk corridors program established by the Affordable Care Act (the “ACA”). Challenges...more

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP

Supreme Court Decides Moda Health Plan, Inc. v. United States

On April 27, 2020, the U.S. Supreme Court decided Moda Health Plan, Inc. v. United States, holding that the Affordable Care Act requires the federal government to compensate insurers for significant losses their health plans...more

Seyfarth Shaw LLP

Supreme Court Rules Government Must Pay $12 Billion to Health Insurers Under ACA Risk Corridor Program

Seyfarth Shaw LLP on

On April 27, 2020, the US Supreme Court ruled by an 8-1 decision that the federal government must pay billions of dollars to health insurers who sold consumer policies on exchanges under the Affordable Care Act’s (“ACA”)...more

Locke Lord LLP

Supreme Court Rules 8-1 That Government Must Pay Health Insurers Under ACA Risk Corridor Program

Locke Lord LLP on

In a major win for health insurers, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in an 8-1 decision that the federal government owes roughly $12.3 billion to health insurers who claimed losses under the risk corridor program of the...more

11 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide