News & Analysis as of

Rules of Civil Procedure Attorney-Client Privilege Discovery

Snell & Wilmer

Arizona Court of Appeals Clarifies Proper Scope of Deposition Questioning and Gives Litigants Early Look at New Special Action...

Snell & Wilmer on

The Arizona Court of Appeals recently held that in a deposition, a party must answer any relevant, non-harassing question, unless the answer is privileged. Attorneys are on notice that sanctions are fair game if they instruct...more

Epiq

2023 eDiscovery Case Law Review

Epiq on

January is a time to set goals and ponder what the new year will bring. It is also a time to think about what happened last year. In the world of litigation, it is important for lawyers and eDiscovery professionals to take...more

Latham & Watkins LLP

Watch What You Write: Communications on Personal Devices Could Be Disclosable in Litigation

Latham & Watkins LLP on

The location of the data is not sufficient to avoid a disclosure order. When it comes to personal devices, people increasingly communicate across multiple platforms, often in an informal and unguarded manner. ...more

Miller Canfield

Michigan Supreme Court Approves Significant Changes to Michigan Court Rules Effective January 1, 2020

Miller Canfield on

The Michigan Supreme Court has adopted proposed changes to several Michigan Court Rules, at the recommendation of the State Bar of Michigan Civil Discovery Rule Review Special Committee. Those changes take effect January 1,...more

4 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide