News & Analysis as of

Samsung Evidence

Stikeman Elliott LLP

Jensen v. Samsung: Federal Court of Appeal Confirms Evidentiary Requirement More Than “Mere Formality”

Stikeman Elliott LLP on

In Jensen v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., 2023 FCA 89, the Federal Court of Appeal (the “Court”) upheld the lower court’s refusal to certify a proposed class action involving allegations that the defendants had breached...more

Jones Day

Deposition Exhibits Allowed With Sur-Replies (Sometimes)

Jones Day on

Under the Board’s rules, a patent owner gets to have the last word in a PTAB proceeding by filing a sur-reply to the petitioner’s reply.  Sur-replies may only respond to arguments raised in the reply, and the “sur-reply … may...more

Knobbe Martens

Another reason to coordinate discovery in parallel litigation – circumvention in section 1782 requests

Knobbe Martens on

The pressures of global litigation have forced litigants to further consider how, when, and where they will obtain discovery. Under developing case law, litigants involved in related litigations in different venues should...more

3 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide