News & Analysis as of May 20, 2025

Supreme Court of the United States › Amicus Briefs › En Banc Review

+ Follow

The United States Supreme Court is the highest court of the United States and is charged with interpreting federal law, including the United States Constitution. The Court's docket is largely discretionary... more +

The United States Supreme Court is the highest court of the United States and is charged with interpreting federal law, including the United States Constitution. The Court's docket is largely discretionary with only a limited number of cases granted review each term. The Court is comprised of one chief justice and eight associate justices, who are nominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate to hold lifetime positions. less -

Edwards v. Meril at the Supreme Court: Testing the Scope of Hatch-Waxman’s Safe Harbor

Knobbe Martens on 12/20/2024

On October 11, 2024, Edwards filed a petition for a writ of certiorari with the U.S. Supreme Court. The question presented, as framed by Edwards, is: “Whether, under Hatch-Waxman’s safe harbor, an infringing act is “solely...more

The Real Story of Hunstein is the Enhanced Analysis, Not the Outcome

McGlinchey Stafford on 11/17/2021

On October 28, 2021, the Eleventh Circuit vacated its April 21, 2021 opinion (Hunstein I) that had sent shockwaves through the debt collection industry and substituted a new Opinion (Hunstein II) in its place...more

Natera Responds to Sequenom's Petition for Rehearing En Banc

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP on 10/26/2015

Last week, Appellee Natera, Inc. filed its response to the petition for rehearing en banc filed by Appellants Sequenom, Inc. and Sequenom Center for Molecular Medicine, LLC in August (see "Sequenom Requests Rehearing En...more

Amicus Briefs in Support of Sequenom's Petition for Rehearing En Banc: JYANT Technologies, Inc.

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP on 9/30/2015

Earlier this summer, in Ariosa Diagnostics, Inc. v. Sequenom, Inc., the Federal Circuit affirmed a decision by the District Court for the Northern District of California granting summary judgment of invalidity of the asserted...more

Amicus Briefs in Support of Sequenom's Petition for Rehearing En Banc: NYIPLA

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP on 9/29/2015

Earlier this summer, in Ariosa Diagnostics, Inc. v. Sequenom, Inc., the Federal Circuit affirmed a decision by the District Court for the Northern District of California granting summary judgment of invalidity of the asserted...more

Amicus Briefs in Support of Sequenom's Petition for Rehearing En Banc: Novartis AG

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP on 9/24/2015

Earlier this summer, in Ariosa Diagnostics, Inc. v. Sequenom, Inc., the Federal Circuit affirmed a decision by the District Court for the Northern District of California granting summary judgment of invalidity of the asserted...more

Amicus Briefs in Support of Sequenom's Petition for Rehearing En Banc: Paul Gilbert Cole

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP on 9/23/2015

Earlier this summer, in Ariosa Diagnostics, Inc. v. Sequenom, Inc., the Federal Circuit affirmed a decision by the District Court for the Northern District of California granting summary judgment of invalidity of the asserted...more

Amicus Briefs in Support of Sequenom's Petition for Rehearing En Banc: Bioindustry Association

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP on 9/21/2015

Earlier this summer, in Ariosa Diagnostics, Inc. v. Sequenom, Inc., the Federal Circuit affirmed a decision by the District Court for the Northern District of California granting summary judgment of invalidity of the asserted...more

Amicus Briefs in Support of Sequenom's Petition for Rehearing En Banc: WARF, Marshfield Clinic, and MCIS, Inc.

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP on 9/18/2015

Earlier this summer, in Ariosa Diagnostics, Inc. v. Sequenom, Inc., the Federal Circuit affirmed a decision by the District Court for the Northern District of California granting summary judgment of invalidity of the asserted...more

Amicus Briefs in Support of Sequenom's Petition for Rehearing En Banc: BIO and PhRMA

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP on 9/17/2015

Earlier this summer, in Ariosa Diagnostics, Inc. v. Sequenom, Inc., the Federal Circuit affirmed a decision by the District Court for the Northern District of California granting summary judgment of invalidity of the asserted...more

Amicus Briefs in Support of Sequenom's Petition for Rehearing En Banc: Amarantus Bioscience Holdings, Personalis, Inc., and...

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP on 9/16/2015

Earlier this summer, in Ariosa Diagnostics, Inc. v. Sequenom, Inc., the Federal Circuit affirmed a decision by the District Court for the Northern District of California granting summary judgment of invalidity of the asserted...more

Amicus Briefs in Support of Sequenom's Petition for Rehearing En Banc: Coalition for 21st Century Medicine

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP on 9/15/2015

Earlier this summer, in Ariosa Diagnostics, Inc. v. Sequenom, Inc., the Federal Circuit affirmed a decision by the District Court for the Northern District of California granting summary judgment of invalidity of the asserted...more

Amicus Briefs in Support of Sequenom's Petition for Rehearing En Banc: IPO

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP on 9/9/2015

Earlier this summer, in Ariosa Diagnostics, Inc. v. Sequenom, Inc., the Federal Circuit affirmed a decision by the District Court for the Northern District of California granting summary judgment of invalidity of the asserted...more

Amicus Briefs in Support of Sequenom's Petition for Rehearing En Banc: 23 Law Professors

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP on 9/4/2015

Earlier this summer, in Ariosa Diagnostics, Inc. v. Sequenom, Inc., the Federal Circuit affirmed a decision by the District Court for the Northern District of California granting summary judgment of invalidity of the asserted...more

14 Results

/

View per page

Page: of 1