News & Analysis as of

Supreme Court of the United States › Clean Water Act › Administrative Procedure Act

The United States Supreme Court is the highest court of the United States and is charged with interpreting federal law, including the United States Constitution. The Court's docket is largely discretionary... more +
The United States Supreme Court is the highest court of the United States and is charged with interpreting federal law, including the United States Constitution. The Court's docket is largely discretionary with only a limited number of cases granted review each term.  The Court is comprised of one chief justice and eight associate justices, who are nominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate to hold lifetime positions. less -
Quarles & Brady LLP

The Future of Environmental Regulation after the Supreme Court Decisions in Loper Bright and Corner Post

Quarles & Brady LLP on

Just in time to celebrate our Nation’s birthday, the United States Supreme Court brought out its hammer to again chip away at the administrative state in two landmark decisions: Loper Bright Enterprises et al. v. Raimondo,...more

Mintz

EPA and the Corps have won one in North Carolina but their most recent Waters of the United States rule isn't nearly out of the...

Mintz on

Judge Boyle of the Federal District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina has denied the Pacific Legal Foundation's client an injunction against EPA's and the Corps of Engineers' most recent Waters of the United...more

Snell & Wilmer

The Revocation of Florida’s Clean Water Act 404 Permitting Program: What It Means Moving Forward in Light of SCOTUS’ Recent...

Snell & Wilmer on

Over three years ago, the Trump administration’s Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) gave Clean Water Act 404 permitting powers to the State of Florida. A few days ago, a judge at the U.S. District Court for the District of...more

Mintz

Half of the United States have now thrown everything but the kitchen sink at EPA's and the Corps of Engineers' WOTUS rule. What...

Mintz on

When EPA and the Corps of Engineers published their tenth attempt to determine the reach of the Federal Clean Water Act, I said the only question remaining was how many of the States and NGOs who challenged EPA's and the...more

Pierce Atwood LLP

Effective Immediately, EPA and Army Corps Drastically Reduce Federal Jurisdiction Over Wetlands

Pierce Atwood LLP on

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) published in the September 8th Federal Register a final rule to amend the “Revised Definition of ‘Waters of the United States’” rule....more

Snell & Wilmer

EPA Issues Emergency New Rule on Waters of the United States

Snell & Wilmer on

Using a rarely invoked exception to the Administrative Procedure Act’s requirement for public notice and comment prior to issuing a new rule, the EPA set forth a new rule governing jurisdiction under the Clean Water Act...more

Bricker Graydon LLP

US EPA and Army Corps Announce Final Rule Amending WOTUS

Bricker Graydon LLP on

On August 29, 2023, the U.S. EPA and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers announced a pre-publication version of their final rule amending the definition of “waters of the United States” (WOTUS) in response to the Sackett v. EPA...more

(ACOEL) | American College of Environmental...

2023 WOTUS Rule Enjoined in Texas and Idaho (Or “Here We Go Again”)

(ACOEL) | American College of Environmental... on

On March 19, 2023, a federal district court in Texas granted a preliminary injunction prohibiting the January 2023 Revised Definition of Waters of the United States (2023 WOTUS rule) promulgated by Environmental Protection...more

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP

Seeking Certainty: Redefining “Waters of the United States”

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP on

The 2023 redefinition reinstates the “1986” framework defining the reach and scope of navigable waters. To determine if a regulated body of water is located on the landowner’s property, the agencies acknowledge these...more

Mintz

Surprise! A 9th Circuit Clean Water Act opinion that a member of the Supreme Court majority could have written!

Mintz on

This week three Judges of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals agreed that a District Court Judge exceeded his authority in vacating an EPA regulation without first determining that the regulation was unlawful. The Trump...more

Mintz

This is no way to run a railroad or make environmental law. EPA's most recent definition of Waters of the United States heads to...

Mintz on

Everyone expected that EPA's eighth attempt to define the reach of the Federal Clean Water Act would end up in court. I have to admit that I was a bit surprised that two groups of plaintiffs filed their lengthy complaints...more

ArentFox Schiff

Key Supreme Court Cases to Watch in Administrative and Environmental Law

ArentFox Schiff on

The first Monday of October means the Supreme Court begins to hear cases for the new term. As we promised at the end of last term, below we summarize cases the Court could address, including issues involving the federal Clean...more

Womble Bond Dickinson

Expansion of the "Waters of the U.S." Rule Delayed; Replacement Rule in the Works

Womble Bond Dickinson on

On February 6, 2018, the EPA formally suspended the Obama-era “Waters of the U.S.” (WOTUS) rule until 2020. This delayed implementation will provide the Trump administration with additional time to issue a clearer, and...more

Blank Rome LLP

SCOTUS Holds that Challenges to the Definition of Waters of the United States Must Be Heard in the U.S. District Courts

Blank Rome LLP on

Benjamin Stonelake In a unanimous decision and opinion delivered by Justice Sotomayor on January 22, 2018, in National Association of Manufacturers v. U.S. Department of Defense, the United States Supreme Court (“SCOTUS”)...more

Snell & Wilmer

SCOTUS Sends WOTUS Back TO District Courts

Snell & Wilmer on

On January 22, 2018, in National Association of Manufacturers v. Department of Defense, the United States Supreme Court held unanimously that challenges to the federal Clean Water Act’s 2015 Waters of the United States...more

Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates & Woodyard,...

Shaking Things Up – The Trump Administration, Regulatory Change, and Administrative Law: Allan Gates (Mitchell Williams) National...

Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates & Woodyard,... on

My law firm colleague Allan Gates undertook a webinar presentation for the National Association of Clean Water Agencies (“NACWA”) titled: - Shaking Things Up – The Trump Administration, Regulatory Change, and...more

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP

Environmental Case Law Update

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP on

“Summer’s lease hath all too short a date.” Many important environmental and administrative law decisions were reported by the federal and state courts over the past six months. The courts are dealing with very...more

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP

Supreme Court’s Environmental and Administrative Law Decisions in 2015-2016 Term

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP on

This Advisory briefly reports on some of the significant U.S. Supreme Court actions from January through June 2016 related to environmental and administrative law. ...more

Williams Mullen

Regulated Parties – 2, Regulators – 0

Williams Mullen on

The United States Supreme Court has handed regulated parties their second win in four years concerning when they can take EPA and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to court over wetlands permitting issues. In 2012, the...more

Williams Mullen

Environmental Notes - July 2016

Williams Mullen on

CONGRESS FINDS THE FORMULA TO REFORM CHEMICAL REGULATION - The Toxic Substance Control Act (TSCA) is the primary federal law by which the manufacture, import and use of chemical substances are regulated in the United...more

Ruder Ware

Wetlands Determinations - Uncertainty for the Clean Water Rule?

Ruder Ware on

On May 31, 2016, the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in United States Army Corps of Engineers v. Hawkes Co., Inc. holding that approved judicial determinations as to the presence of wetlands issued by the...more

Carlton Fields

SCOTUS Gives Landowners New Tools to Challenge Wetlands Permitting Decisions

Carlton Fields on

The United States Supreme Court handed landowners and developers a win this month in a unanimous decision allowing appeals to federal courts of Army Corps of Engineers determinations that a body of water or wetland is subject...more

Womble Bond Dickinson

Supreme Court Rules Landowners Can Challenge Jurisdictional Determinations

Womble Bond Dickinson on

On May 31, 2016, in a unanimous ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court held in USACE v. Hawkes Co. that approved jurisdictional determinations (“JD”) are final actions which can be reviewed by the courts. Under the Clean Water Act a...more

Jackson Walker

The Supreme Court Holds that Army Corps’ Jurisdictional Determinations are Final Actions Subject to Judicial Review

Jackson Walker on

On May 31, 2016, in United States Army Corps of Engineers v. Hawkes Co., the US Supreme Court unanimously held that a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ (Corps) approved jurisdictional determination (JD) is a final agency action...more

Allen Matkins

California Environmental Law & Policy Update - June 2016

Allen Matkins on

Environmental and Policy Focus - U.S. Supreme Court allows pre-permit challenges to approved jurisdictional determinations - Allen Matkins - May 31 - In a major new legal development for the Clean Water Act's...more

54 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 3
Next »

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide