News & Analysis as of

Securities Act of 1933 › Securities Litigation › Removal

The Securities Act of 1933 is a United States federal statute enacted in response to the stock market crash of 1929 and the ensuing Great Depression. The Act has two primary purposes: 1) to give investors better... more +
The Securities Act of 1933 is a United States federal statute enacted in response to the stock market crash of 1929 and the ensuing Great Depression. The Act has two primary purposes: 1) to give investors better access to material information prior to investing 2) ensure that transactions are not based on fraud. In order to effectuate its dual goals, the Act requires that any offer or sale of securities is registered with the SEC. less -
Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP

Judge Rules California State Law Does Not Prohibit Federal Forum Provisions That Seek To Avoid Cyan’s Bar on Removal of Securities...

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP on

- California state court held that federal forum provisions for Securities Act claims are not illegal and may be used to sidestep the bar on removal of Securities Act claims following the United States Supreme Court’s ruling...more

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP

Delaware Supreme Court: Delaware Corporations May Adopt Federal-Forum Provisions Requiring That Securities Act Claims Be Brought...

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP on

Ruling suggests a new means of stemming the flood tide of state-court Securities Act claims that followed the U.S. Supreme Court’s Cyan decision in 2018. But uncertainty lingers as to whether post-IPO public companies can...more

A&O Shearman

U.S. Chamber Of Commerce's Institute Of Legal Reform Publishes Report On "Broken Securities Class Action System" And Proposes...

A&O Shearman on

On February 25, 2019, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce’s Institute of Legal Reform (the “ILR”) published a report entitled “Containing the Contagion: Proposals to Reform the Broken Securities Class Action System” (the “Report”)....more

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP

Delaware Court of Chancery Invalidates Forum Selection Provisions Regulating Claims Under the Securities Act of 1933

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP on

On December 19, 2018, the Delaware Court of Chancery held that forum selection provisions contained in the certificate of incorporation of Delaware corporations are invalid to the extent that they require any claim under the...more

Moore & Van Allen PLLC

The Doors of State Courthouses Remain Open to Class Action Plaintiffs with Federal Securities Act of 1933 Claims Related to...

Moore & Van Allen PLLC on

In 2017, federal securities class actions were filed at a rapid clip, averaging more than one per day – a level not seen in nearly 20 years according to survey data. It was the third year of growth and a 44% increase over...more

Bass, Berry & Sims PLC

IPOs and Registered Offerings Beware – Supreme Court Decision Risks Increased Lawsuits in State Courts

Bass, Berry & Sims PLC on

On March 20, 2018, a unanimous United States Supreme Court, in Cyan, Inc. v. Beaver Cty. Employees Ret. Fund, No. 15-1439, 2018 WL 1384564, answered two questions concerning investors' ability to pursue alleged violations of...more

Fenwick & West LLP

Supreme Court Rules That Securities Act Class Actions May Proceed in State Court

Fenwick & West LLP on

The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that class action plaintiffs can bring claims under the Securities Act of 1933 in either state or federal court. ...more

Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP

Supreme Court in Cyan Upholds State Court Securities Act Class Actions

Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP on

In Cyan, Inc. v. Beaver County Employees Retirement Fund, No. 15-1439, decided on March 20, 2018, the Supreme Court unanimously held that class actions based solely on the Securities Act of 1933 (33 Act) may be brought in...more

Troutman Pepper

Supreme Court's Cyan Decision Means Open Season for Investor Class Actions After IPOs

Troutman Pepper on

The U.S. Supreme Court issued a unanimous decision on March 20 holding that investors are free to file securities class action lawsuits challenging the veracity of stock registration statements under Section 11 of the...more

Jones Day

Supreme Court Rules on State Court Jurisdiction over Securities Act Lawsuits

Jones Day on

In recent years, plaintiffs increasingly have challenged initial public offerings by filing securities class actions in state courts, especially California, due to an unsettled jurisdictional question. In Cyan, Inc. v. Beaver...more

Burr & Forman

SCOTUS: Pure ‘33 Act Class Actions Not Removable Under SLUSA

Burr & Forman on

A unanimous Supreme Court recently held that “covered class actions” over exchange-traded securities are not removable from state courts under SLUSA when they assert only ‘33 Act claims....more

A&O Shearman

U.S. Supreme Court Holds In Cyan That SLUSA Does Not Divest State Courts Of Jurisdiction Over Federal Securities Act Claims And...

A&O Shearman on

On March 20, 2018, the Supreme Court of the United States, in a unanimous decision delivered by Justice Kagan, ruled that state courts have jurisdiction to adjudicate class actions brought under the Securities Act of 1933...more

Mintz

Issuers Face Changing Litigation Landscape, Challenges Due to Supreme Court Ruling

Mintz on

In a boon for public company shareholder plaintiffs this week, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld state courts’ concurrent jurisdiction over securities class actions alleging violations of certain federal securities laws. The...more

Perkins Coie

U.S. Supreme Court Confirms State Courts Can Resolve Covered 1933 Act Class Actions

Perkins Coie on

On Tuesday, a unanimous U.S. Supreme Court held that state courts have jurisdiction to hear “covered” class-action claims under the Securities Act of 1933 (1993 Act), and that defendants may not remove such claims to federal...more

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP

Supreme Court Affirms State Courts Have Jurisdiction To Hear Federal Securities Act Class Actions In Cyan, Inc. V. Beaver County...

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP on

Earlier this week, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its highly anticipated ruling in Cyan, Inc. v. Beaver County Employees Retirement Fund, which addresses whether state courts have jurisdiction over securities class actions...more

Carlton Fields

Cyan Makes SLUSA Removal Proponents Feel Blue: Supreme Court Holds That Securities Act Of 1933 Class Actions Can Stay In State...

Carlton Fields on

On March 20, the Supreme Court reached two holdings important to securities litigators. First, the Court held that the Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act of 1998 (“SLUSA”) did not strip state courts of their ability...more

Latham & Watkins LLP

Supreme Court: SLUSA Does Not Prohibit State Court Jurisdiction Over Securities Act Class Actions

Latham & Watkins LLP on

In Cyan, Inc., the Justices unanimously decide that state courts have jurisdiction over federal Securities Act class actions. Key Points: ..Resolves split of authority on whether the Securities Litigation Uniform...more

Seyfarth Shaw LLP

Supreme Court Affirms State Courts’ Jurisdiction Over 1933 Act Claims

Seyfarth Shaw LLP on

Seyfarth Synopsis: In a much-awaited decision on which courts and counsel have reached different conclusions for years, the United States Supreme Court held on March 20, 2018 that the Securities Litigation Uniform Standards...more

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP

Supreme Court Confirms State Court Jurisdiction of ’33 Act Claims

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP on

A unanimous ruling rejects arguments that SLUSA eliminates concurrent state-court jurisdiction of “covered class actions” brought under the Securities Act of 1933, or at least permits the removal of such actions. Supreme...more

Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati

U.S. Supreme Court Holds that Securities Act Class Actions May Be Brought in State Courts

Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati on

Today, the Supreme Court of the United States held that state courts have jurisdiction over class actions brought under the Securities Act of 1933 (Securities Act) and that such actions filed in state court may not be removed...more

Allen Matkins

Cyan And The California Company

Allen Matkins on

On March 20, 2018, the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in Cyan, Inc. v. Beaver County Employees Retirement Fund, reaffirming that a class action alleging only violations of the federal Securities Act of 1933...more

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP

Supreme Court Holds That Class Actions Brought Under Securities Act in State Court Are Not Removable

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP on

Today, in a unanimous decision, the U.S. Supreme Court held in Cyan, Inc. et al. v. Beaver County Employees Retirement Fund, et al., No. 15-1439, slip op. at __ (Mar. 20, 2018), that state and federal courts have concurrent...more

Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP

Supreme Court to Determine State Court Jurisdiction of Class Actions Under Securities Act of 1933

Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP on

On June 27, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in Cyan Inc. et al. v. Beaver County Employees Retirement Fund et al., agreeing to weigh in on whether state courts have jurisdiction to hear class action lawsuits brought...more

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP

Supreme Court to Resolve Split on Removing Securities Act Claims to Federal Court

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP on

The Supreme Court granted the petition for certiorari in Cyan, Inc. v. Beaver Cty. Emps. Ret. Fund, No. 15-1439 (U.S. May 24, 2016) yesterday, setting the stage for the resolution of a long-standing division among federal...more

24 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide