News & Analysis as of

Securities Act of 1933 › Securities Violations › Split of Authority

The Securities Act of 1933 is a United States federal statute enacted in response to the stock market crash of 1929 and the ensuing Great Depression. The Act has two primary purposes: 1) to give investors better... more +
The Securities Act of 1933 is a United States federal statute enacted in response to the stock market crash of 1929 and the ensuing Great Depression. The Act has two primary purposes: 1) to give investors better access to material information prior to investing 2) ensure that transactions are not based on fraud. In order to effectuate its dual goals, the Act requires that any offer or sale of securities is registered with the SEC. less -
Bass, Berry & Sims PLC

IPOs and Registered Offerings Beware – Supreme Court Decision Risks Increased Lawsuits in State Courts

Bass, Berry & Sims PLC on

On March 20, 2018, a unanimous United States Supreme Court, in Cyan, Inc. v. Beaver Cty. Employees Ret. Fund, No. 15-1439, 2018 WL 1384564, answered two questions concerning investors' ability to pursue alleged violations of...more

A&O Shearman

U.S. Supreme Court Holds In Cyan That SLUSA Does Not Divest State Courts Of Jurisdiction Over Federal Securities Act Claims And...

A&O Shearman on

On March 20, 2018, the Supreme Court of the United States, in a unanimous decision delivered by Justice Kagan, ruled that state courts have jurisdiction to adjudicate class actions brought under the Securities Act of 1933...more

Mintz

Issuers Face Changing Litigation Landscape, Challenges Due to Supreme Court Ruling

Mintz on

In a boon for public company shareholder plaintiffs this week, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld state courts’ concurrent jurisdiction over securities class actions alleging violations of certain federal securities laws. The...more

Perkins Coie

U.S. Supreme Court Confirms State Courts Can Resolve Covered 1933 Act Class Actions

Perkins Coie on

On Tuesday, a unanimous U.S. Supreme Court held that state courts have jurisdiction to hear “covered” class-action claims under the Securities Act of 1933 (1993 Act), and that defendants may not remove such claims to federal...more

Latham & Watkins LLP

Supreme Court: SLUSA Does Not Prohibit State Court Jurisdiction Over Securities Act Class Actions

Latham & Watkins LLP on

In Cyan, Inc., the Justices unanimously decide that state courts have jurisdiction over federal Securities Act class actions. Key Points: ..Resolves split of authority on whether the Securities Litigation Uniform...more

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP

Supreme Court Confirms State Court Jurisdiction of ’33 Act Claims

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP on

A unanimous ruling rejects arguments that SLUSA eliminates concurrent state-court jurisdiction of “covered class actions” brought under the Securities Act of 1933, or at least permits the removal of such actions. Supreme...more

Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati

U.S. Supreme Court Holds that Securities Act Class Actions May Be Brought in State Courts

Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati on

Today, the Supreme Court of the United States held that state courts have jurisdiction over class actions brought under the Securities Act of 1933 (Securities Act) and that such actions filed in state court may not be removed...more

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP

Supreme Court Holds That Class Actions Brought Under Securities Act in State Court Are Not Removable

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP on

Today, in a unanimous decision, the U.S. Supreme Court held in Cyan, Inc. et al. v. Beaver County Employees Retirement Fund, et al., No. 15-1439, slip op. at __ (Mar. 20, 2018), that state and federal courts have concurrent...more

8 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide