News & Analysis as of

Securities Fraud California

A&O Shearman

Northern District Of California Dismisses Putative Securities Class Action Against Grocery Delivery Company For Failure To...

A&O Shearman on

On May 9, 2025, Judge Edward J. Davila of the Northern District of California granted a motion to dismiss a purported securities class action against a grocery delivery company (the “Company”), certain of its officers and...more

A&O Shearman

Northern District Of California Dismisses Putative Class Action Against Solar Panel Manufacturer For Failure To Allege Falsity

A&O Shearman on

On April 28, 2025, Judge Edward M. Chen of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California dismissed a putative securities fraud class action asserting claims against a solar panel manufacturer (the...more

A&O Shearman

California Appellate Court Affirms Dismissal Of Putative Class Action Against Electric Vehicle Company Based On Federal Forum...

A&O Shearman on

On April 23, 2025, the Fourth Appellate District Court of Appeal of the State of California affirmed the dismissal of a putative class action asserting claims under the Securities Act of 1933 against an electric vehicle...more

A&O Shearman

Central District Of California Dismisses Putative Securities Class Action Against Healthcare Technology Company For Failure To...

A&O Shearman on

On April 18, 2025, Judge André Birotte Jr. of the Central District of California granted a motion to dismiss a putative class action asserting claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the...more

Allen Matkins

When Do Blue Sky Laws Apply?

Allen Matkins on

In my experience, many securities lawyers are well versed in the federal securities laws, but have little experience with state securities laws.  This is understandable because federal law in many cases preempts state...more

Woodruff Sawyer

Securities Motion to Dismiss Trends (Part 1): The Northern District of California

Woodruff Sawyer on

In securities class actions, the motion to dismiss is the key event. If the company wins, the case goes away and costly discovery is avoided. If shareholders win, a significant settlement in the future is likely. In these...more

A&O Shearman

Northern District Of California Grants Motion To Dismiss Federal Securities Class Action Against Subscription Streaming Services...

A&O Shearman on

On November 26, 2024, Judge Jon S. Tigar of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California granted a motion to dismiss a putative securities fraud class action against a subscription streaming...more

Allen Matkins

Is Due Process Denied When The DFPI Isn't Required To Read Or Become Familiar With The Record?

Allen Matkins on

In  S.E.C. v. Jarkesy, 2024 WL 3187811 (June 27, 2024), the United States Supreme Court held that when the Securities and Exchange Commission seeks civil penalties against a defendant for securities fraud, the Seventh...more

Allen Matkins

Does Jarkesy Negate Administrative Penalties Under The California Corporate Securities Law?

Allen Matkins on

Yesterday, the United States Supreme Court held that when the Securities and Exchange Commission seeks civil penalties against a defendant for securities fraud, the Seventh Amendment to the U.S. Constitution entitles the...more

Allen Matkins

Department Of Financial Protection & Innovation Warns Investors About Nonexistent Class Action Settlement

Allen Matkins on

Yesterday, the California Department of Financial Protection & Innovation warned investors that an "entity calling itself “Hartman Cain & Associates,” which represents itself as a law firm based in California, and operates...more

Allen Matkins

Judge Rules Plaintiff Lacked Standing To Claim Damages Whilst Still Holding Securities

Allen Matkins on

Part 5 of the California Corporate Securities Law of 1968 sets forth a number of fraudulent and prohibited practices.  One of these practices is to "to offer or sell a security in this state, or to buy or offer to buy a...more

Allen Matkins

Are Securities Law And Unfair Competition Law Claims Miscible?

Allen Matkins on

Recently, I wrote about the ruling in Cress v. Nexo Financial LLC, 2023 WL 6609352 (Oct. 10, 2023).   Today's post covers a different issue addressed in that case - to what extent does California's securities law preclude...more

Morrison & Foerster LLP

U.S. Attorney for the Central District of California Announces a New Corporate and Securities Fraud Strike Force to Ramp up...

Morrison & Foerster LLP on

On October 4, 2023, Martin Estrada, U.S. Attorney for the Central District of California (CDCA), announced the formation of a Corporate and Securities Fraud Strike Force (the “Strike Force”), a new CDCA section designed to...more

Allen Matkins

A Form D Is Not A Registration Statement And Why It Might Matter

Allen Matkins on

Securities law practitioners know that Section 5(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 generally makes it unlawful to sell a security unless a registration statement is in effect, or the security or the transaction is exempt. ...more

Troutman Pepper Locke

The US Attorney's Office for the Central District of California Announces Securities Fraud Task Force

Troutman Pepper Locke on

On October 4, U.S. Attorney for the Central District of California Martin Estrada announced the formation of a new task force, the Corporate and Securities Fraud Strike Force....more

Allen Matkins

DFPI Goes Multimedia In Recent Crypto Enforcement Actions

Allen Matkins on

Early this week, the California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation issued desist and refrain orders alleging violations by the following individual and entities...more

A&O Shearman

California District Court Grants With Prejudice Motion To Dismiss Securities Fraud Class Action Against Video Game Company,...

A&O Shearman on

On January 22, 2023, Judge Percy Anderson of the United States District Court for the Central District of California granted a motion to dismiss the third amended class action complaint (“TAC”) in a putative class action...more

Allen Matkins

A Truly Piscatory Exemption

Allen Matkins on

California's blue sky law, the Corporate Securities Law of 1968, generally requires that offers and sales of securities be qualified unless the security or transaction is exempt or not subject to qualification.  Most...more

Allen Matkins

Why Privity Matters

Allen Matkins on

In 2011, I posed the following question: Is Privity Required Or Not Required Under Section 25500?  Section 25500 of the California Corporations Code provides the remedy for violations of Section 25400 which declares unlawful...more

Allen Matkins

Insider Trading Under The CSL - There Is No Shadow Of Turning With Thee

Allen Matkins on

Last summer, the Securities and Exchange Commission charged yet another corporate insider, Matthew Panuwar, with insider trading.  This case was unusual because Mr. Panuwar did not trade in the securities of his employer,...more

Allen Matkins

Something Is Missing From Section 1203

Allen Matkins on

In 1988, the California legislature enacted a unique fairness opinion requirement for certain "interested party" tender offers, including a share exchange tender offers (Section 183.5) or written proposals for a written a...more

Allen Matkins

Court Rules "Thoughtful," "Disciplined," and "Dynamic" Are But Short Blasts Of Wind

Allen Matkins on

Semper Midas Fund, Ltd was formed for to invest primarily in mortgage-related instruments.  Five months after investing over $300,000 in the fund, the Alan Kalin was told that that the fund had lost over 50% of its value. ...more

Allen Matkins

Securities Claim Fails Because Option Exercise Is Not A Sale

Allen Matkins on

A recent decision by the Nevada Supreme Court highlights the definition of "sale" in Section 25017 of the California Corporations Code.  The suit arose from the plaintiff's claim that certain facts were not disclosed to him...more

Allen Matkins

What Type Of Crime Is Securities Fraud In California?

Allen Matkins on

Section 25401 of the California Corporations Code, which was modeled on Section 12(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, provides...more

A&O Shearman

Northern District Of California Allows Certain Securities Fraud Claims To Proceed Against Cloud Services Company, Holding...

A&O Shearman on

On September 11, 2020, Judge William H. Orrick of the Northern District of California denied a motion to dismiss a putative securities class action asserting claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange...more

25 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide