News & Analysis as of

Sixth Amendment Racial Bias

Whitcomb Selinsky, PC

The People versus Race

Whitcomb Selinsky, PC on

The prosecutor's opening statement was "flagrantly, glaring, and tremendously improper". Those are the words the Colorado Court of Appeals used to describe the racially charged language a District Attorney (D.A., prosecution)...more

Clark Hill PLC

SCOTUS Carves Out an Exception to the No-Impeachment Rule

Clark Hill PLC on

On March 6, 2017, Pena-Rodriguez v. Colorado opened the curtain on jury deliberations for the purpose of correcting racial and ethnic bias that might have infected a jury's verdict. In Pena-Rodriguez, the United States...more

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP

Criminal Defendants Have a Constitutional Right to Introduce Evidence of Clear Racial Bias in Jury Room After Guilty Verdict

The no-impeachment rule is that once a jury’s verdict has been entered, it cannot generally be called into question based on the comments or conclusions during jury deliberations. In Pena-Rodriguez v. Colorado, the U.S....more

Proskauer - Minding Your Business

Is Evidence of Juror Bias in Deliberations Admissible? Supreme Court to Decide

What happens in the jury room, stays in the jury room. Except when it doesn’t. Earlier this month, the Supreme Court agreed to hear the appeal of a Colorado man whose counsel learned, after the guilty verdict was rendered,...more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

The Supreme Court - April 2016

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

The Supreme Court of the United States issued decisions in two cases on April 4, 2016: - Evenwel v. Abbott, No. 14-940: In this legislative redistricting case, certain voters brought a challenge to the redistricting in...more

5 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide