News & Analysis as of

SLUSA Fraud Ponzi Scheme

Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP

No SLUSA Protection Absent Material Connection With Sale/Purchase of Covered Security

In Chadbourne & Parke LLP v. Troice, the U.S. Supreme Court held on February 26, 2014, that the victims of Allen Stanford’s multibillion-dollar Ponzi scheme can proceed with their claims against law firms, insurance brokers,...more

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP

Second Circuit Clarifies Scope of SLUSA Preclusion

In Trezziova v. Kohn (In re Herald, Primeo & Thema Sec. Litig.), No. 12-156-cv, 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 19132 (2d Cir. Sept. 16, 2013), the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed the dismissal of state...more

Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP

Second Circuit Affirms Judgment that SLUSA Precludes Madoff-Related Claims

The US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed the district court’s dismissal of two class action suits by European investors on behalf of all investors in certain funds (Funds), against JPMorgan Chase & Co....more

Dechert LLP

The United States Supreme Court Will Review the Scope of Federal Preclusion of State Securities Claims

Dechert LLP on

On January 18, 2013, the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari to resolve a circuit split concerning the extent to which the Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act of 1998 (“SLUSA”) preempts state law claims...more

4 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide