News & Analysis as of

Starbucks Proposition 65

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP

Prop 65 Warnings and Acrylamide in Food – Can I Still Have My Coffee and Drink it Too?

Many of us think of coffee as a morning essential, however, there has been a long running debate between California regulators, courts, business, and consumer advocates regarding whether coffee must have a Proposition 65...more

BCLP

California Prop. 65 Regulation Exempts Certain Coffee Chemicals From Cancer Warning; Stay in Coffee Case Lifted

BCLP on

California’s Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (“OEHHA”) has finalized a highly anticipated Proposition 65 regulation relating to coffee. The regulation, California Code of Regulations Section 25704, takes...more

Buchalter

New Life For A Dormant Defense: Do Proposition 65 Warnings Violate The First Amendment?

Buchalter on

Can you be forced to slap language on a product you sell that not only do you not agree with but which can be false or misleading – and scare your customers? In California the answer is yes. But that may be finally...more

Morrison & Foerster LLP - Class Dismissed

BREAKING: Appellate Court Halts Trial on Coffee

On Friday, October 12, 2018, California’s Second Appellate District Court stayed the trial that was set to begin on Monday, October 15, 2018, in Los Angeles Superior Court, regarding whether cancer warnings are required for...more

BCLP

Coffee Defendants Likely To Seek Stay of Prop. 65 Action Following OEHHA’s Proposal to Exempt Coffee From Cancer Warning...

BCLP on

Defendants in the Proposition 65 case against Starbucks and numerous other coffee manufacturers and retailers have indicated that they intend to file a motion to stay that action following a proposal by the California agency...more

BCLP

Coffee Defendants Likely To Seek Stay of Prop. 65 Action Following OEHHA’s Proposal to Exempt Coffee From Warning Requirement

BCLP on

Defendants in the Proposition 65 case against Starbucks and numerous other coffee manufacturers and retailers have indicated that they intend to file a motion to stay that action following a proposal by the California agency...more

Farella Braun + Martel LLP

California Court Ruling Leads to New Labeling Requirements for Coffee Products

If you've spent any time in California, you've probably seen it. And seen it. And seen it again. An omnipresent warning, etched into a plaque on the wall, or printed on product packaging: “This product contains chemicals...more

Lewitt Hackman

Court’s Prop 65 Ruling a Great “Brewhaha” for Coffee Retailers

Lewitt Hackman on

In 2010, a nonprofit group called The Council for Education and Research on Toxics (CERT) brought a lawsuit against 91 commercial coffee roasters, retailers and distributors. ...more

Lathrop GPM

Coffee and Cancer Warnings in California

Lathrop GPM on

Thirty-two years ago, a major California newspaper urged Californians to vote “no” on a ballot initiative commonly referred to as “Prop 65,” which would require certain businesses to include warning labels on products that...more

Husch Blackwell LLP

Coffee Now Served With A Cancer Warning In California

Husch Blackwell LLP on

Coffee sellers in the State of California will now be required to provide cancer warnings on their coffee products. On March 28, 2018, a California State Court issued a Statement of Decision in a Proposition 65 (Prop 65) case...more

BCLP

Prop. 65 Litigation Involving Acrylamide Heats Up on Eve of Ruling in Coffee Cases

BCLP on

California Proposition 65 litigation over acrylamide in food has been heating up lately, receiving national news coverage in anticipation of a ruling in a fiercely contested case involving exposure to acrylamide in coffee. ...more

Downey Brand LLP

California Grocer: Brewing Debate in California Proposition 65 Coffee Action Coming to a Close

Downey Brand LLP on

For the past six years, a collection of coffee brewers and retailers have been embroiled in a legal battle with Council for Education and Research on Toxics (CERT) over whether certain coffee products sold in California must...more

Lewitt Hackman

Old Grounds: A Lack of Prop 65 Warnings Brew Trouble for Coffee Franchisors

Lewitt Hackman on

California Prop 65 warnings – many residents barely notice these anymore, as we’ve lived with Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act notices for over 30 years now. They appear at gas pumps; in apartment and office...more

Mintz - Consumer Product Safety Viewpoints

Battle of the Experts Still Brewin’ in Starbucks Trial

In April 2010, the Council for Education and Research on Toxics (CERT) sued Starbucks Corp. and other coffee sellers alleging they violated California’s Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act, passed by California...more

14 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide