Feeling Disillusioned with AI? You’re Not Alone
Key Discovery Points: Petty Finger Pointing Over Search Terms Results in Wasted Time
Key Discovery Points: AI Says AI Will Replace Paralegals… But Not So Fast!
Key Discovery Points: Timing Sweet Spots for Spoliation Motions
Key Discovery Points: Should Hyperlinked Files Be Treated as Modern Attachments?
How Attorneys’ Views on AI Are Impacting eDiscovery
Key Discovery Points: Get Your Objections In Early – and Keep Your Filings Succinct
Why Lawyers Can't Ignore eDiscovery
The AI Trust Test in eDiscovery
eDiscovery Tips: Helpful Questions to Ask Your Clients
30-Minute Workshop: Resume Clinic for EDiscovery Project Managers
Examining E-Discovery in Competition Law
eDiscovery for the Rest of Us: Why Small Firm eDiscovery Matters
Sitting with the C-Suite: Trial Teams – Narrowing Data through Centric Search
In October 2022, the UK legal system marked a significant evolution in its approach to disclosure with the implementation of Practice Direction 57AD (PD57AD). This directive, applicable to the Business and Property Courts of...more
In today's rapidly evolving legal landscape, the integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into investigation and document review processes is transforming the way legal professionals operate. AI technologies promise...more
Legalweek 2025 Session Recap - What does it mean to trust AI? According to AI expert Ron Brachman, “it’s when technology demonstrates consistent behavior over time.” Trust is a cornerstone of any successful AI deployment....more
As a Vice President of Regional Sales at Purpose Legal, I spend a lot of time speaking with legal teams about their biggest concerns when it comes to AI in eDiscovery. Whether I’m meeting with corporate legal departments, law...more
In the ever-evolving legal technology landscape, Hanzo is at the forefront of innovation with its groundbreaking tool, Spotlight AI. Designed to revolutionize the way legal professionals manage and analyze vast amounts of...more
As Thanksgiving approaches, we extend our warmest wishes to everyone celebrating this special occasion. May your day be filled with joy, surrounded by family and friends. In the spirit of gratitude and innovation, we present...more
In my last post on the EDRM blog, I discussed 3 reasons why people avoid using Technology Assisted Review (TAR)/predictive coding (and related technologies) in their cases. So, what can we do to change that? Here are 4 ways...more
This seems like the perfect topic to cover for my very first blog post on the EDRM site, for which I’ll be starting to provide posts regularly! Last week, I received an email from a reader of eDiscovery Today in which she...more
In a recent post, we discussed that requesting parties often demand more transparency with a Technology Assisted Review (TAR) process than they do with a process involving keyword search and manual review. So, how do you get...more
Since Judge Andrew Peck’s ruling over nine years ago in Da Silva Moore v. Publicis Groupe & MSL Group, the use of Technology-Assisted Review (TAR) for managing review in eDiscovery has been court approved. Yet many lawyers...more
Recently, ACEDS hosted a webinar entitled “Point|Counterpoint: A Proposed TAR Framework,” during which a stellar panel of lawyers, including Redgrave’s Christine Payne and Kirkland & Ellis’ Michele Six represented the defense...more
It is well established that courts will support parties electing to use technology assisted review (TAR) to identify responsive documents in discovery. However, TAR methodologies and quality control (QC) measures are still...more
A recent discovery order in a Southern District of New York public housing lottery discrimination case supported the use of technology assisted review (TAR) but required additional transparency, providing another view into...more
Magistrate Judge Andrew J. Peck’s recent decision in Rio Tinto PLC v. Vale S.A., S.D.N.Y., No. 14 Civ. 3042 (RMB)(AJP) (March 2, 2015), recognizes disclosure of non-responsive documents is not a per se requirement in cases...more