News & Analysis as of

Transparency e-Discovery

Array

This Week in eDiscovery: Florida Ethics Opinion Guides Use of Generative AI, the Dangers of Third-Party Discovery Delays, and More

Array on

Every week, the Array team reviews the latest news and analysis about the evolving field of eDiscovery to bring you the topics and trends you need to know. This week’s blog covers the week of January 22-28. Here’s what’s...more

Array

As Corporate Counsel Look to Cut Costs, Here’s How You Can Prepare

Array on

Two-thirds of corporate counsel will bring work in-house next year to reduce costs: That’s the major takeaway from an industry survey from Everlaw and the Association of Corporate Counsel (ACC) released this fall....more

Hanzo

Understanding California Senate Bill 235: A New Chapter in Civil Discovery

Hanzo on

When it comes to the legal landscape, every new law or amendment can have a significant impact on the processes and outcomes for litigants. A recent change in California, Senate Bill 235 (CA SB235), signed into law by Gavin...more

Array

Five Questions to Ask Your eDiscovery Partner

Array on

Discovery is a critical element in any legal matter. In complex litigation and investigations, electronic discovery tends to cover a large portion of that process. As firms and in-house legal teams work to cover an increasing...more

Nextpoint, Inc.

Cute Chihuahua or Blueberry Muffin? Exploring the Practical Applications of AI in Ediscovery

Nextpoint, Inc. on

Many tout AI in ediscovery as the next big thing for the legal tech world – but what can this technology really do for lawyers today? Can you tell the difference between a picture of a cute brown chihuahua and a tasty...more

Reveal

How Outside Counsel Can Improve Cooperation With In-House Counsel in 2023

Reveal on

Outside counsel is an integral part of the legal industry. Sometimes companies hire law firms to handle the entirety of a legal issue or dispute, while other times they retain outside counsel only for specific questions or...more

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP

SDNY Recognizes Party Using TAR Not Required to Disclose Control Sets to Opposing Party

Magistrate Judge Andrew J. Peck’s recent decision in Rio Tinto PLC v. Vale S.A., S.D.N.Y., No. 14 Civ. 3042 (RMB)(AJP) (March 2, 2015), recognizes disclosure of non-responsive documents is not a per se requirement in cases...more

7 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide