News & Analysis as of

Undue Prejudice Patents

Mintz - Intellectual Property Viewpoints

Infringement Contentions: Fair Notice?

Some respondents at the ITC have taken advantage of using infringement contentions as a procedural tool to deny patent owners from getting their day in court. In some investigations, respondents have gone so far as to delay...more

Mintz - Intellectual Property Viewpoints

Can Infringement Contentions be Amended to Add New Claims Resulting from an Ex Parte Reexam Filed after IPRs Invalidated Some but...

Judge Gilliam of the Northern District of California recently answered this question and provided helpful guidance on the interplay of IPRs, reexaminations and district court litigation. In IXI Mobile (R&D) Ltd., et al., v....more

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP

Patent Owner Precluded from Asserting in Litigation Claims Obtained Through Ex Parte Reexamination

A district court has denied a request to amend patent infringement contentions to add claims obtained through ex parte reexamination after the case had been substantially narrowed through a parallel inter partes review (IPR)...more

Jones Day

Trial Court Denies Amendment of Contentions To Add Reexam Claims Following Successful IPR

Jones Day on

What happens when patent claims are found unpatentable in inter partes review (“IPR”) and new claims are subsequently added to that patent through ex parte reexamination? The District Court for the Northern District of...more

Smart & Biggar

Eli Lilly granted leave to add new cause of action of direct infringement of "composition for use" claims, absent allegation of...

Smart & Biggar on

(Updated October 1, 2019) - On July 3, 2019, Eli Lilly was granted leave to amend its pleadings to introduce a new cause of action for direct infringement of claims relating to a new use without including an allegation of...more

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP

District Court Denies Grant of Partial Stay Pending IPR Due to Defendants’ Delay

In 3G Licensing, S.A. et al v. HTC Corporation, the Honorable Christopher J. Burke of the District of Delaware denied Defendants’ motion for partial stay pending resolution of inter partes review (IPR) because of the lack of...more

McDermott Will & Emery

Joinder of Same Party Permitted Only in Limited Circumstances; Error Does Not Qualify

Setting precedent on whether a party may use joinder under § 315(c) to add new issues to its own petitions, the Precedential Opinion Panel (POP) of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) determined that in very limited...more

Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.

PTAB Strategies and Insights - November 2018: The Growing Influence of Post-Grant Proceedings in Section 337 Investigations

Since the passage of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (AIA), post-grant proceedings at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) are interacting more with Section 337 investigations at the International Trade Commission...more

Morris James LLP

Motion To Stay Pending Appeals Is Denied

Morris James LLP on

LG Electronics, Inc., et al. v. Toshiba Samsung Storage, et al., C.A. No. 12-1063-LPS-CJB, December 11, 2015. Stark, C. J. Defendant’s motion to stay proceedings as to the ‘162 patent is granted as unopposed. Its...more

9 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide