Jon Wright

2/8/2023  /  § 314(d) , § 315(b) , 35 U.S.C. §315(e)(1) , Abuse of Discretion , Administrative Patent Judges , Administrative Procedure Act , America Invents Act , Anticipation , Apple , Appointments Clause , Arbitrary and Capricious , Arthrex Inc v Smith & Nephew Inc , Article III , Artificial Intelligence , Broadcom , Burden of Persuasion , Burden of Production , Confidentiality Agreements , Consent Order , Constitutional Challenges , Covenant Not to Sue , Director of the USPTO , Doctrine of Equivalents , Estoppel , Evidence , Ex Partes Reexamination , Expert Testimony , Failure To Disclose , Federal Vacancies Reform Act , Final Written Decisions , Forum Selection , Google , Indefiniteness , Intel , Intellectual Property Litigation , Intellectual Property Protection , Inter Partes Review (IPR) Proceeding , International Trade Commission (ITC) , Inventions , Inventors , Joint Inventors , Jurisdiction , Lack of Jurisdiction , Likelihood of Confusion , Motion to Amend , Motion to Terminate , Obviousness , Obviousness-Type Double Patenting (ODP) , Parallel Proceedings , Patent Act , Patent Applications , Patent Infringement , Patent Invalidity , Patent Litigation , Patent Prosecution , Patent Trial and Appeal Board , Patent-Eligible Subject Matter , Patents , Post-Grant Review , Preliminary Injunctions , Preponderance of the Evidence , Prior Art , Qualcomm , Real Party in Interest , Remand , Section 101 , Section 112 , Separation of Powers , Standing , Statutory Authority , Sua Sponte , Substantial Evidence , Testimony , Time-Barred Claims , Trademark Application , Trademark Infringement , Trademark Litigation , Trademark Registration , Trademark Trial and Appeal Board , Trademarks , USPTO , Vacated , Written Descriptions

4/20/2015  /  Additional Discovery , America Invents Act , Certifications , Claim Construction , Evidence , Motion to Amend , Patents , Post-Grant Review , Real Party in Interest , Rule 11 , Testimony , Trial Practice Guidance , USPTO