News & Analysis as of

Electronic Discovery Civil Remedies Intellectual Property

Read Electronic Discovery updates, articles, and commentary from leading lawyers, law firms, and legal consultants:

Court Rules Decisively in Battle Between eDiscovery Providers Over Hired Sales Agents: eDiscovery Case Law

by CloudNine on

In a lawsuit filed by DTI against LDiscovery and four former sales agents of DTI who were hired by LDiscovery, claiming they misappropriated trade secrets, interfered with client relationships and breached their contracts, an...more

Brunswick Rail Wins Emergency Evidence Protection in Trade Secret Case Against Former Employees

by Zapproved LLC on

OOO Brunswick Rail Mgmt. v. Sultanov, No. 5:17-cv-00017-EJD, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2343 (N.D. Cal. Jan. 6, 2017). The court partially granted the plaintiff, OOO Brunswick Rail Mgmt., a motion for emergency evidence...more

Supreme Court Gives Samsung an Early Christmas Present – For Now: eDiscovery Case Law

by CloudNine on

We almost made it the entire year without an update on the ubiquitous Apple v. Samsung case. Thanks to the U.S. Supreme Court, this long lasting case isn’t done yet....more

Stop the Music: $25 Million Verdict Intact Despite Party’s Intentional Spoliation of Evidence

by Zapproved LLC on

The court entered final judgment, upholding the jury’s findings and denying the defendant’s motion for a new trial, finding that harsher sanctions for the plaintiff’s intentional spoliation of material evidence were not...more

I’ve Made a Huge Mistake: Intentional Destruction of ESI is No Illusion

by Exterro, Inc. on

In season three of the series Arrested Development, episode 11 finds George Bluth, Sr. unsurprisingly using a giant electromagnet in an attempt to delete electronic computer files, which could potentially indict him for...more

ITC Affirms Joint and Several Liability of Counsel for Payment of Monetary Sanctions Based on Client's Spoliation of Evidence

by Mintz Levin on

On April 30, 2015, the International Trade Commission issued the public version of its opinion reviewing ALJ Thomas B. Pender’s Initial Determination in Investigation No. 337-TA-883, finding the Respondents in default due to...more

Don’t Sleep on Rule 37 Motions

What do you get when opposing counsel repeatedly cancels depositions only days before they are scheduled, allegedly fails to abide by confidentiality agreements and court orders, and repeatedly files supposedly baseless...more

Truth or Consequences: Sanctions Fly in Telenovela Copyright Infringement Case

The case of Latele Television v. Telemundo Communications Group might have been a simple factual dispute over copyright ownership, but instead it has devolved into a series of accusations — including allegations of willful...more

IP Newsflash - December 2014

Federal Circuit Vacates Lower Court’s Obviousness Finding Based on Incorrect Application of Inherency Doctrine - In Par Pharmaceutical, the Federal Circuit vacated an obviousness ruling by the district court, finding...more

Judge Forrest Denies Attorneys’ Fees and Ancillary Electronic Discovery Costs

by Robins Kaplan LLP on

Rejecting claims that the matter was “exceptional” under 35 U.S.C. § 285 so as to permit the recovery of attorneys’ fees, Judge Forrest declined to award fees incurred between the court’s Markman order and order on summary...more

BakerHostetler Patent Watch CBT Flint Partners, LLC v. Return Path, Inc.

by BakerHostetler on

On December 13, 2013, in CBT Flint Partners, LLC v. Return Path, Inc., the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (Dyk, O'Malley, Taranto*) reversed-in-part, vacated-in-part and remanded the district court judgment...more

Awarding e-Discovery Costs to Prevailing Party: Billing Descriptions Dictate What is Recoverable

by Valorem Law Group LLC on

E-discovery costs incurred by the prevailing party – easily running into the hundreds of thousands of dollars in complex commercial and IP litigations – may be compensable under 28 U.S.C. § 1920(4)....more

California Federal Court Awards Millions for Predictive Coding Costs in Document Review

by Ballard Spahr LLP on

A federal court in California recently awarded defendants in a patent infringement case more than $2.8 million in attorneys’ fees relating to the use of “predictive coding,” also known as “computer-assisted technology,” to...more

Computer-Assisted Review Costs Awarded in California Patent Case

by Morgan Lewis on

Court finds that using technology to undertake more efficient document review is reasonable. On February 1, Judge Anthony J. Battaglia of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California awarded more...more

NEW JERSEY CHANCERY DIVISION DECISION PROVIDES TEXTBOOK EXAMPLE OF HOW NOT TO PART WAYS WITH AN EMPLOYER AND START YOUR OWN...

by Kevin O'Connor on

In my prior blogs I’ve addressed the legal remedies available to employers when employees violate confidentiality agreements or restrictive covenants, and unfairly compete. A new opinion by Judge Frederic Kessler, P.J. Ch....more

IP Update, Vol. 15, No. 4, April 2012

by McDermott Will & Emery on

In This Issue: - Patents *Patent Applicants Can Submit New Evidence to the District Court in Civil Actions Under §145 *To Quote Mark Twain, “Reports of My (Inequitable Conduct) Death Have Been Greatly...more

16 Results
|
View per page
Page: of 1
Cybersecurity

Follow Electronic Discovery Updates on:

"My best business intelligence,
in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.