News & Analysis as of

Amgen Inc. v Connecticut Retirement Plans Rebuttable Presumptions Amgen

Latham & Watkins LLP

Not So Basic Supreme Court to Revisit the Fraud-­on-­the Market Presumption of Reliance

Latham & Watkins LLP on

Parties to pending securities fraud class actions may adjust litigation strategies, even before the Court revisits Basic’s presumption of investor reliance. On Friday, November 15, 2013, the Supreme Court granted...more

Akerman LLP

Supreme Court Update: Two Securities Law Decisions This Week, and Another to Come

Akerman LLP on

The United States Supreme Court has taken a keen interest in the securities arena this current term, agreeing to hear at least three cases (of only approximately 70 in total). This week, the Supreme Court announced decisions...more

BakerHostetler

Materiality Can Wait, Says the Supreme Court in Amgen

BakerHostetler on

The following post is reprinted with permission from Paul Karlsgodt’s blog, www.classactionblawg.com. The Supreme Court has issued its opinion in one of the most highly anticipated class action-related cases on the...more

Proskauer Rose LLP

U.S. Supreme Court Rejects Need to Prove Materiality at Class-Certification Stage in Securities Class Actions

Proskauer Rose LLP on

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled on February 27, 2013 that a plaintiff need not prove materiality as a prerequisite to obtaining class certification in a securities class action. The Court's ruling in Amgen Inc. v. Connecticut...more

4 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide