News & Analysis as of

Anti-SLAPP Interlocutory Appeals

Fenwick & West LLP

Ninth Circuit to Rehear Appealability of Denied Anti-SLAPP Motions

Fenwick & West LLP on

The Ninth Circuit has granted a rehearing en banc in Martinez v. ZoomInfo Tech., Inc. concerning the appealability of denial of anti-SLAPP motions under the collateral order doctrine. Historically, the Ninth Circuit has...more

Morrison & Foerster LLP - Left Coast Appeals

This Week At The Ninth: The Public Interest Exemption to California’s Anti-SLAPP Law

This week, the Ninth Circuit affirms the district court’s denial of a special motion to strike under California’s anti-SLAPP statute, with two of the judges on the panel questioning the Court’s precedent holding that such...more

Morrison & Foerster LLP

Five Key Lessons for Business Litigators from National Abortion Federation v. Center for Medical Progress

On February 5, 2016, Morrison & Foerster secured a preliminary injunction on behalf of its client, National Abortion Federation (“NAF”), in National Abortion Federation v. Center for Medical Progress. The firm’s work on this...more

Davis Wright Tremaine LLP

2015: A Year-End Review of Litigation Using California’s Anti-SLAPP Statute

Annually, California’s Courts of Appeal and the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals regularly issue several dozen published opinions interpreting California’s anti-SLAPP statute, Civil Procedure Section 425.16 et seq., and...more

4 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide