News & Analysis as of

Breach of Duty › NC Supreme Court

Rivkin Radler LLP

Insurance Update - January 24, 2023

Rivkin Radler LLP on

It was a busy end to the year, as courts handed down several key insurance decisions before ringing in 2023. The Ohio Supreme Court considered the contours of “direct physical loss or damage” in two separate decisions –...more

Ward and Smith, P.A.

More on King v. Bryant and Health Care Arbitration Agreements

Ward and Smith, P.A. on

As discussed in an earlier article, the North Carolina Supreme Court recently held, in King v. Bryant, that physicians have a fiduciary relationship with their patients due to the special relationship of trust and confidence...more

Smith Anderson

NC Fiduciaries Have a Duty to Explain Arbitration Agreements in Contracts

Smith Anderson on

The Supreme Court of North Carolina recently issued an opinion that could have a substantial impact on the enforceability of arbitration agreements when a fiduciary relationship exists, particularly in the context of consumer...more

Brooks Pierce

NC Business Court Says That Bank Didn't Owe A Fiduciary Duty To Its Customer, But Recognizes New Cause Of Action: Breach Of A Duty...

Brooks Pierce on

Were you thinking that the Business Court might, one day, find that a bank owed a fiduciary duty to its customer? That seemed like it might happen eventually, as the NC Supreme Court seemed to hold out that possibility last...more

4 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide