News & Analysis as of

California Endangered Species Act State Department of Fish and Wildlife

Perkins Coie

California Court Rules Bees Can Be Listed Under the California Endangered Species Act

Perkins Coie on

In a notable decision interpreting the California Endangered Species Act (CESA), a California court of appeal ruled that insects are eligible for listing as threatened, endangered, or candidate species under the act. See...more

Perkins Coie

Sacramento Superior Court Rules That Insects Are Not Eligible for Listing Under the California Endangered Species Act

Perkins Coie on

In a widely watched case, the Sacramento Superior Court court ruled that insects are not eligible for listing under the California Endangered Species Act. Almond Alliance of California v. California Department of Fish and...more

Nossaman LLP

Fish and Game Commission Violated Law by Seeking to Protect Bees under CESA

Nossaman LLP on

The Sacramento Superior Court upheld a challenge to a decision by the California Fish and Game Commission to designate four subspecies of bumble bees as candidates for protection under the California Endangered Species Act...more

Best Best & Krieger LLP

Western Joshua Trees Receive Temporary Protection Under the California Endangered Species Act

Designation Impacts Local Ordinances and Developments Involving the Tree - Of particular significance to desert communities, the California Fish and Game Commission designated the western Joshua tree as a “candidate”...more

Perkins Coie

CA Supreme Court Boosts Plaintiffs’ Challenges to Endangered Species Listing Under CESA

Perkins Coie on

The Supreme Court of California recently ruled that under the California Endangered Species Act (CESA), plaintiffs may use a delisting petition, supported by new evidence, to challenge a prior decision by the California Fish...more

Stoel Rives LLP

Your Tricolored Blackbird Problem Just Got Worse – Candidate Listing under the California ESA

Stoel Rives LLP on

Looks like Christmas came early, again, for the Center for Biological Diversity (CBD). Based on a petition submitted by CBD, the California Fish and Game Commission voted earlier this month to designate the tricolored...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

CEQA Strikes Again: Supreme Court of California Decision Highlights the Importance of Managing Environmental Issues in Project...

Foley & Lardner LLP on

On November 30, 2015, the California Supreme Court halted a nearly 12,000 acre mixed-use development project that was 15-years in the making in Los Angeles County, and had earned both state and local agency support. The...more

Nossaman LLP

California Supreme Court Ponders Fully Protected Species Issues

Nossaman LLP on

On September 2, 2015, the California Supreme Court heard oral argument in a case involving fully protected species that may have important state-wide implications. (Center for Biological Diversity v. Department of Fish and...more

Holland & Knight LLP

New Regulations Could Expand CEQA Review of Impacts to Common Birds - California Department of Fish & Wildlife Proposes Draft...

Holland & Knight LLP on

The California Department of Fish & Wildlife (CDFW) published draft regulations interpreting California laws that protect birds of prey, and the nests and eggs of birds generally. These draft regulations, released on Aug. 14,...more

Nossaman LLP

California Fish and Game Commission Lists Population of Fisher Under the California Endangered Species Act

Nossaman LLP on

On August 6, 2015, the California Fish and Game Commission (Commission) voted to list the southern Sierra Nevada evolutionarily significant unit of the fisher (Pekania pennati) as a threatened species under the California...more

Nossaman LLP

California Fish and Game Commission Votes Not to Make Tricolored Blackbird Candidate for Listing

Nossaman LLP on

Thursday, in response to a petition to list filed by the Center for Biological Diversity (CBD) in October 2014, the California Fish and Game Commission (Commission) determined not to make the tricolored blackbird (agelaius...more

Stoel Rives LLP

Is A 16% Reduction in GHG Emissions From "Business-As-Usual" Enough Under CEQA?

Stoel Rives LLP on

Our previous post on the Second District Court of Appeal’s decision in Center for Biological Diversity v. Department of Fish & Wildlife, No. B245141 (Mar. 20, 2014), highlighted the court’s holdings on California...more

12 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide