News & Analysis as of

CIGNA Supreme Court of the United States

Stevens & Lee

Supreme Court’s Decision in SuperValu May Benefit Defendants in False Claims Act Cases

Stevens & Lee on

Last month in United States ex rel. Schutte, et al. v. SuperValu Inc. et al, the Supreme Court unanimously held (with Justice Thomas writing the opinion) that the False Claims Act’s (“FCA”) scienter element refers to a...more

ArentFox Schiff

Investigations Newsletter: SCOTUS Denies Cert In Cases Addressing FCA Pleadings Requirements

ArentFox Schiff on

SCOTUS Denies Cert In Cases Addressing FCA Pleadings Requirements - On Monday, October 17, 2022, the US Supreme Court rejected three petitions asking the Court to resolve a circuit split regarding the Rule 9(b)...more

Akerman LLP - Health Law Rx

Will President Trump’s Supreme Court Pick Have an Influence on The Healthcare Industry?

On July 9, 2018, President Trump announced his intention to nominate D.C. Circuit Court Judge Brett Kavanaugh to replace retiring Justice Anthony Kennedy on the Supreme Court....more

McGuireWoods LLP

Supreme Court Limits ERISA Healthcare Plan’s Reimbursement Rights: What Montanile Really Means

McGuireWoods LLP on

Last week, the United States Supreme Court held that an ERISA healthcare benefit plan with reimbursement rights can only obtain “appropriate equitable relief” when enforcing its lien against a third-party settlement, thus...more

Williams Mullen

Court Holds That ERISA Plaintiff Cannot Claim Equitable Remedies When the Plaintiff Has Adequate Remedies to Recover Plan...

Williams Mullen on

A federal court has ruled that, although a recent U. S. Supreme Court decision expanded the kinds of equitable remedies available to a plaintiff under ERISA § 502(a)(3), those remedies are still unavailable when the ERISA...more

Dickinson Wright

ERISA Legal News - 1st Quarter, 2013 • Volume 4, Number 1

Dickinson Wright on

In This Issue: - Supreme Court Update: Where Plan Reimbursement Or Recovery Terms Are Ambiguous Or Silent,Equitable Doctrines May Fill The Gaps: US Airways, Inc. v. McCutchen, 569 U.S. ___ (2013). In an...more

King & Spalding

Court Rewrites Plan to Increase Benefits

King & Spalding on

The Supreme Court’s 2011 CIGNA v. Amara decision suggested that an employer’s pension plan could be rewritten to remedy the employer’s failure to fulfill its disclosure obligations under the Employee Retirement Income...more

7 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide