Class Certification, Rule 23 | JD Supra Law News

California Courts Issue Multiple Decisions for Employers in Class Cases

by Greg Mersol | BakerHostetler on 5/17/2013

Just two years ago, a California case declining certification of an action would have been cause for comment. But since then, in 2011 the United States Supreme Court decided Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Dukes, 131 S. Ct. 2541...more

ERISA Legal News - 1st Quarter, 2013 • Volume 4, Number 1

by Kimberly Ruppel | Dickinson Wright on 4/23/2013

In This Issue: - Supreme Court Update: Where Plan Reimbursement Or Recovery Terms Are Ambiguous Or Silent,Equitable Doctrines May Fill The Gaps: US Airways, Inc. v. McCutchen, 569 U.S. ___ (2013). In an...more

The Hard Stop On ‘Adventurous Innovation’ In Class Action Litigation: The United States Supreme Court’s Decision In Comcast v....

by Livia Kiser, Michael Mallow | Loeb & Loeb LLP on 4/22/2013

Comcast v. Behrend is the latest opinion issued by the U.S. Supreme Court interpreting and applying the procedural rules governing class actions set out in Federal Rule Civil Procedure 23. In order to obtain certification of...more

Comcast v. Behrend: New Opportunities for Class Action Defendants?

by Matthew Ball, Jason Haycock | K&L Gates LLP on 4/19/2013

The Supreme Court’s recent opinion in Comcast Corp. v. Behrend all but invites defendants to make a number of arguments when attempting to defeat class certification. The Behrend case is therefore the latest move by the U.S....more

Data Breach Class Actions Can't Survive Certification Without Expert Testimony On Classwide Damages

by Amelia Gerlicher, James McCullagh | Perkins Coie on 4/17/2013

This is the latest opinion in the ongoing litigation arising out of a massive data breach suffered by Hannaford Bros. grocery stores. In re Hannaford Bros. Privacy Litigation, __F. Supp. 2d __, Case No. 2:08-MD-1954-DBH, 2013...more

View From Proskauer: U.S. Supreme Court Provides Defendants With More Ammunition for Defeating Class Certification by Requiring...

by Jacklina Len | Proskauer - ERISA Practice Center on 4/16/2013

The U.S. Supreme Court recently ruled in Comcast Corp. v. Behrend, 2013 WL 1222646 (U.S. Mar. 27, 2013) that, in order to obtain class certification, plaintiffs carry the burden of establishing not only that they have proof...more

No April Fools: U.S. Supreme Court Suggests That the Lower Courts Stop Joking Around With Class Action Certification

by Rachel Reynolds | Sedgwick LLP on 4/12/2013

On April 1, 2013, the U.S. Supreme Court granted certiorari, and then summarily vacated, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals’ decision to certify a class composed of purchasers of Whirlpool washing machines (Whirlpool v....more

Supreme Court Raises the Bar to Class Certification

by Thomas Goodwin, Richard Hernandez, William O'Shaughnessy, David Reif, Eric Watt Wiechmann | McCarter & English, LLP on 4/11/2013

The United States Supreme Court has continued to raise the bar on class certification by requiring that plaintiffs be able to prove damages on a class-wide basis. In Comcast Corporation v. Behrend, a putative class alleged...more

United States Supreme Court Extends Class Certification “Rigorous Analysis” to Damages Evidence

by E.K. Cottrell, Kristen Wenger | Fowler White Boggs P.A. on 4/10/2013

The Supreme Court recently applied its “rigorous analysis” standard to class-wide damages evidence and reversed class certification. See Comcast Corp. v. Behrend, No. 11-864 (Mar. 27, 2013) (slip opinion). The “rigorous...more

Did You Know…A Sea Change In Class Action Certification

by Veronica Gray | Nossaman LLP on 4/9/2013

In Comcast v. Behrend, a class action case involving how much Comcast charged cable TV subscribers, the United States Supreme Court held that as a prerequisite for certification of a class action, a plaintiff must introduce...more

Big Developments in Class Actions Part 1: a “rigorous analysis” of Comcast Corp. v. Behrend

by Adam Dougherty | Winstead PC on 4/9/2013

In a very pro-employer/business opinion crafted by Justice Scalia, the U.S. Supreme Court rejected class certification for 2 million Comcast subscribers in an antitrust class action in Comcast Corp. v. Behrend, 516 U.S. ___...more

Antitrust and Competition Newsletter - April 2013

by Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP on 4/4/2013

In This Issue: - A Modern Look at The Nine Patent Licensing ‘No-Nos’ (Part Two): The Last Five ‘No-Nos’ *United States - Supreme Court Holds That Class Certification Under Rule 23(b)(3) Is Inappropriate...more

Supreme Court Holds Damages Must be Measurable on a Classwide Basis for Class Certification

by Erik Hult | Littler on 4/4/2013

In a significant class action decision for employers, Comcast Corp. et al v. Behrend et al, No. 11-864 (March 27, 2013), the U.S. Supreme Court held that the ability to establish classwide damages is essential to a favorable...more

Plaintiffs' Bar is Whistling Past the Graveyard on Comcast

by Thomas R. Kaufman | Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP on 4/3/2013

As many readers of this blog know by now, last week the Supreme Court issued yet another anti-class certification decision in Comcast Corp. v. Behrend (“Comcast”). While the full scope and meaning of the Court’s holding is...more

Put up your Dukes! Supreme Court Clarifies that Damages Must be Capable of Class Wide Resolution in Rule 23(b)(3) Class Actions...

by Chris Brown, Byron Lau, Gary Siniscalco | Orrick - Global Employment Law Group on 4/3/2013

The United States Supreme Court’s recent ruling in Comcast Corp. v. Behrend, Case No. 11-864 (March 27, 2013) reinforces class certification requirements as spelled out in Wal-Mart v. Dukes. However, the closely divided court...more

Class Action Alert: Recent Developments Favorable for Employers

by Bradford G. Harvey, Jennifer W. Terry | Miller & Martin PLLC on 4/2/2013

Individualized Proof of Damages Can Block Class Certification Under Rule 23(b)(3) - The United States Supreme Court in Comcast v. Behrend continued its trend of disfavoring class certification of cases involving...more

Supreme Court Directs Trial Courts To Look At The Merits In Determining Whether To Certify A Class

by Michael Newman | Barger & Wolen on 4/2/2013

Comcast v Behrend is the latest in a series of United States Supreme Court cases in recent years that have restricted the ability of plaintiffs to certify federal class actions. In so doing, it has expanded the scope of the...more

Comcast v. Behrend Sets a Higher Bar for Class Certification

by Jennifer Driscoll-Chippendale | Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP on 4/2/2013

On March 27, 2013, the U.S. Supreme Court continued its recent trend of imposing more stringent standards for class certification in Comcast Corporation v. Behrend, 569 U.S. ___ (2013). At issue was whether the proponents of...more

Supreme Court Rules Class Certification Requires Evidence of Damages Supported by a Valid Legal Theory

by Bill Cobb, David Moran | Jackson Walker on 4/1/2013

Effectively equates "rigorous analysis" with "merits analysis" - On March 27, 2013, in Comcast Corp. v. Behrend, the United States Supreme Court reaffirmed that district courts must perform a "rigorous analysis" of...more

U.S. Supreme Court Throws Into Question Proof Of Damages Requirements For Class Certification

by Shylah R. Alfonso, Jacqueline Young | Perkins Coie on 4/1/2013

On March 27, 2013, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its decision in Comcast Corp. v. Behrend, 569 U.S. ___, No. 11-864, 2013 WL 1222646 (Mar. 27, 2013). In a 5-4 decision, the Court reemphasized its recent precedent in Wal-Mart...more

Cables Sliced on Class Action in Comcast Corp. v. Behrend

by Carolyn Budzinski, Christine Levin | Dechert LLP on 3/29/2013

Key Points - - Comcast Corp. v. Behrend clarifies that the Court's 2011 decision in Wal-Mart v. Dukes, which requires an inquiry into the merits to the extent necessary to resolve Rule 23 issues, extends to antitrust...more

Did You Know…Class Certification Denied In Wang v. Chinese Daily News

by Veronica Gray | Nossaman LLP on 3/7/2013

In Wang v. Chinese Daily News, the Ninth Circuit reversed the class certification it had previously affirmed and remanded the matter for further consideration of Rule 23(a) commonality and Rule 23(b)(3) predominance. ...more

Shareholder Plaintiffs Score A Class Certification Win From SCOTUS

by Robert Cohen, Lori Lynn Phillips, Danielle Van Wert | Orrick - Securities Litigation and Regulatory... on 3/1/2013

On Wednesday, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Amgen, Inc. v. Connecticut Retirement Plans. In a 6-3 decision authored by Justice Ginsburg, the Supreme Court handed a win to plaintiffs in securities fraud class...more

Amgen Inc. v. Connecticut Retirement Plans And Trust Funds: Does Supreme Court Put “Cart Before The Horse” To Satisfy Predominance...

by Joshua E. Roberts | Carlton Fields on 2/28/2013

To best understand this decision, we need to look at the rules concerning both class actions and securities: - According to Rule 23(b)(3), a class action may be maintained if the court finds that questions of law or...more

Seventh Circuit Rejects Class Trial By [Un]Representative Sample

by Rodger Eckelberry | Foley & Lardner LLP on 2/19/2013

In Espenscheid v. DirectSat USA, LLC, Case No. 12-1943 (7th Cir. Feb. 4, 2013), in a combined collective/class action asserting claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act and state law, three satellite installation technicians...more

Home

Legal News

Find a Lawyer

Browse Subjects

Subscribe

Pro Services

For Reporters

Class Certification › Rule 23