News & Analysis as of

Criminal Prosecution Personal Benefit

Carlton Fields

Can Government Use Criminal Fraud Statute to Get Around “Personal Benefit” Requirement for Insider Trading?

Carlton Fields on

The government prosecutes insider trading against insiders who convey material nonpublic information (“tippers”) and outsiders who acquire material nonpublic information (“tippees”) through two avenues: civil proceedings...more

BakerHostetler

Second Circuit Vacates Insider Trading Convictions, Narrowing the Scope of Future Prosecutions

BakerHostetler on

As discussed more fully in our alert when Blaszczak I was issued, the crux of this case was that four individuals were charged with and convicted of an alleged scheme to obtain nonpublic information from the Centers for...more

Burr & Forman

Insider Trading Trending

Burr & Forman on

This winter has seen insider-trading trending – and not just because President Trump pardoned Michael Milken.  In sequence, several legislative proposals have been working their way through Congress, the Second Circuit...more

Allen Matkins

Bharara Task Force Overlooks California Insider Trading Statute

Allen Matkins on

I have long advocated for a federal statutory definition of insider trading because I believe that the current approach has been for the courts to convict first and then explicate the theory supporting the conviction in a...more

Perkins Coie

Second Circuit Provides Easier Path for Criminal Insider Trading Cases

Perkins Coie on

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued an opinion in United States v. Blaszczak on December 30, 2019 that could significantly affect the prosecution of criminal insider trading cases. The Second Circuit...more

BakerHostetler

Second Circuit Endorses New Criminal Theory for Insider Trading Prosecution

BakerHostetler on

For the first time since the Supreme Court’s 1983 decision in Dirks v. SEC, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed an insider trading conviction without proof of a personal benefit to the insider...more

Polsinelli

Prosecutors Not Required to Prove Tipper Received “Personal Benefit” to be Convicted Under Criminal Insider Trading Statute

Polsinelli on

On December 30, 2019 the Second Circuit issued its opinion in United States v. Blaszczak, finding that the government can criminally prosecute insider trading under 18 U.S.C. 1348 without proving personal benefit to the...more

WilmerHale

Insider Trading Law Alert: The Second Circuit Clears the Path for Insider Trading Convictions Absent a Dirks Personal Benefit

WilmerHale on

On December 30, 2019, the Second Circuit issued a consequential insider trading decision in United States v. Blaszczak. In Blaszczak, the Second Circuit faced the question whether the “personal benefit” test set forth in...more

Bass, Berry & Sims PLC

Chris Lazarini Analyzes Second Appeal to Vacate Insider Trading Conviction

Bass, Berry & Sims PLC on

Bass, Berry & Sims attorney Chris Lazarini analyzed a defendant’s second appeal to vacate an insider trading conviction. On the direct appeal, the individual raised multiple evidentiary issues, but did not challenge the jury...more

A&O Shearman

Second Circuit Re-Affirms Insider Trading Conviction Of Rajat Gupta

A&O Shearman on

On January 7, 2019, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed — for the second time — the insider trading conviction of Rajat Gupta. Gupta v. United States, No. 15-2707 (2d Cir. Jan. 7, 2019). In a...more

Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP

“King for a Day”

In a decision extolling jurors’ use of “common sense” to evaluate insider trading charges, the Second Circuit affirmed the conviction of Robert Schulman in United States v. Klein (Schulman), No. 17-3355. ...more

Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP

Rajat Gupta’s Insider Trading Conviction Affirmed

In a brief summary order issued yesterday, the Second Circuit denied Rajat Gupta’s collateral attack on his insider trading conviction in Gupta v. United States, Nos. 15-2707(L), 15-2712(C). ...more

Proskauer - Corporate Defense and Disputes

Insider Trading for Dummies: Judge Rakoff Tries to Simplify the Law

A lot of ink has been spilled over the crime of insider trading, which – in the view of U.S. District Judge Jed Rakoff – “is a straightforward concept that some courts have managed to complicate.” In his recent decision in...more

Proskauer Rose LLP

Second Circuit Again Holds That Tipper/Tippee Liability Can Arise from a Gift of Inside Information Even Without a Close Personal...

Proskauer Rose LLP on

The Second Circuit confirmed this week that a "meaningfully close personal relationship" is not required for insider-trading liability where a tipper discloses inside information as a gift with the intent to benefit the...more

Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP

Newman’s “Meaningfully Close Personal Relationship” Requirement No Longer Good Law

A divided Second Circuit panel (Katzmann, Pooler (dissenting), Chin) on Wednesday upheld the insider trading conviction of former SAC Capital portfolio manager Mathew Martoma. Confronting its precedent in United States v....more

Jones Day

Second Circuit Court of Appeals Expands Insider Trading Liability

Jones Day on

On August 23, 2017, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the insider trading conviction of Matthew Martoma, a former portfolio manager for SAC Capital Advisors LLP ("SAC Capital"). In doing so, the court overturned...more

BakerHostetler

Second Circuit Majority in U.S. v. Martoma Eliminates Proof of Financial or Other Personal Benefits to Tipper for Conviction

BakerHostetler on

On Aug. 23, 2017, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued a split decision in United States v. Martoma, upholding a portfolio manager’s insider trading conviction and finding that a tippee need not...more

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP

"2016-17 Supreme Court Update"

In a season of political surprises, the eight-member U.S. Supreme Court has stirred no controversy with its decisions so far this term. The handful of opinions the Court released in the fall were unanimous and, for the most...more

Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP

How “Close” is Close Enough? Parties Submit Supplemental Briefing in Martoma in Light of Salman

The Supreme Court’s decision in Salman v. United States, 137 S.Ct. 420 (2016) is already having an effect on the appeals arising out of the insider trading convictions in the Southern District of New York. Shortly after...more

K&L Gates LLP

Insider Trading Law After Salman v. United States

K&L Gates LLP on

In Salman v. United States, decided on December 6, 2016, the Supreme Court upheld a conviction for criminal violations of insider trading laws. The Court, however, declined to adopt the expansive theories of insider trading...more

Baker Donelson

Salman v. U.S.: More Questions than Answers?

Baker Donelson on

The United States Supreme Court recently rendered a decision in Salman1 resolving a circuit split over whether the government prosecuting an insider trading case must show that the person giving an insider tip received...more

Lowndes

7 Things You Should Consider To Avoid Criminal Prosecution

Lowndes on

In its first insider trading ruling in almost 20 years, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld a ruling by the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals that a person can be held criminally liable for passing inside information to a friend or...more

Miller Canfield

U.S. Supreme Court Affirms Broader View of “Personal Benefits” That Can Trigger Insider-Trading Liability

Miller Canfield on

To be liable for insider trading in violation of the federal securities laws, the insider “tipper” who discloses the inside information must personally benefit, directly or indirectly, from his disclosure to a “tippee” who...more

Latham & Watkins LLP

Supreme Court Revisits Insider-Trading Liability

Latham & Watkins LLP on

Salman reaffirms Dirks and holds that a “gift” of inside information to a trading relative or friend continues to meet the personal-benefit requirement. The Salman Prosecution - In 2011, Bassam Yacoub Salman was...more

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP

United States v. Salman: Supreme Court Reaffirms “Friends With Benefits” Test In Insider Trading Cases

On December 6, 2016, in an opinion written by Justice Alito, the Supreme Court unanimously affirmed the Ninth Circuit’s decision in Salman v. United States, a closely-watched insider trading tipping case. Salman builds upon...more

38 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 2

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide