News & Analysis as of

Discovery Request for Production

EDRM - Electronic Discovery Reference Model

Another Cinderella Situation – Motion Denied as Untimely?

In Fiskars Finland OY AB v. Woodland Tools Inc., 2024 WL 2504717 (W.D. Wisc. May 24, 2024), plaintiff sued for alleged misappropriation of trade secrets. Defendants counterclaimed....more

TransPerfect Legal

Five Things to Consider When Thinking About an RFP

TransPerfect Legal on

A primary objective of an e-discovery RFP is to identify the best long-term partner for your organization. Providers’ core services—collection, processing, and review—are mostly the same. It is how these services are...more

Nextpoint, Inc.

Demystifying Ediscovery Production Formats

Nextpoint, Inc. on

When it comes to ediscovery production, it’s absolutely advantageous to keep the end goal in mind from the outset. The duty to produce is explicitly outlined in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and most analogous State...more

Stange Law Firm, PC

Why Discovery Is Important in Family Law Matters

Stange Law Firm, PC on

Divorce and family law matters involve civil litigation in the family court. However, many are unsure what the purpose of discovery may be in divorce and family law litigation....more

Association of Certified E-Discovery...

The Time to Move eDiscovery to the Cloud is Now, Part Two: Making It Happen

In Part One of this post, I outlined a business case for migrating eDiscovery operations to the cloud. Now it’s time to review the basic steps you need to take to make it actually happen. Review contracts, map systems - ...more

Spilman Thomas & Battle, PLLC

Crosmun v. The Trustees of Fayetteville Technical Community College Provides Much Needed Guidance to North Carolina Courts on How...

The Court of Appeals of North Carolina's decision in Crosmun v. The Trustees of Fayetteville Technical Community College, ___ N.C. App. ___, 832 S.E.2d 223 (2019) provides much needed guidance to North Carolina courts on how...more

Bricker Graydon LLP

PA appellate court holds that physician credentialing file is not protected by the state peer review privilege

Bricker Graydon LLP on

In a highly unfavorable peer review decision, Leadbitter v. Keystone Anesthesia v. Petraglia, entered on February 12, 2020, a Pennsylvania state appellate court upheld an order compelling a hospital to produce the unredacted...more

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP

All in the Corporate Family: Attorney-Client Privilege Applies Between Parent and Subsidiaries

The District of New Jersey confirmed that members of a corporate family all are represented by the same in-house counsel, whether that counsel occupies an office within the parent company or within a subsidiary, because...more

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP

Latin America Dispute Resolution Update – The Latest Developments in Cross-Border Disputes Involving the US and Latin America - ...

US Supreme Court Issues Trio of Arbitration Decisions - During its 2018-19 term, the U.S. Supreme Court issued decisions in three cases involving arbitration matters. These decisions, discussed further in our September 26,...more

Dechert LLP

Potential Criminality Under Foreign Law Not a Bar to Disclosure of Documents in English Civil Proceedings

Dechert LLP on

Bank Mellat v HM Treasury [2019] EWCA Civ 449 - Synopsis - Obligations of confidentiality arising under a foreign legal system do not automatically entitle a party litigating in England to withhold documents from...more

Hanzo

Seeking Production in Native Format? Case Law Tips From MetLife Investors USA Insurance Co. v. Lindsey

Hanzo on

Over the last year, requests and productions of native-format documents have featured regularly in ediscovery cases resolved by the courts. These cases have demonstrated how differently litigants—and judges—view the...more

Hanzo

Case Law Summary: Native-Format Production — Lessons From McDonnel Group, LLC v. Starr Surplus Lines Insurance Co.

Hanzo on

With some electronically stored information (ESI), what you see is what you get. A simple screenshot, PDF, or TIFF image may convey all the information that a litigant needs....more

FordHarrison

Help! I Just Received a Charge of Discrimination. Now What? - Part 2 of 3

FordHarrison on

In this three-part series, we are exploring best practices for handling a charge of discrimination. The first part of the series addressed important preliminary questions you should be asking upon initial receipt of the...more

Association of Certified E-Discovery...

The Sedona Conference’s FRCP 34(b)(2) Primer

In March 2018,  The Sedona Conference published another useful guide for e-discovery professionals, Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 34(b)(2) Primer: Practice Pointers for Responding to Discovery Requests. This guide is the...more

Association of Certified E-Discovery...

TAR Protocol Rules the Roost: In Re Broiler Chicken

It is well established that courts will support parties electing to use technology assisted review (TAR) to identify responsive documents in discovery. However, TAR methodologies and quality control (QC) measures are still...more

Carlton Fields

District Court Largely Denies Defendants’ Requested Protective Order On Variety Of Discovery Requests In Consolidated Class...

Carlton Fields on

On November 15, 2017, we reported on two class actions alleging that the “EquityComp” workers’ compensation insurance program marketed and sold by Applied Underwriters (“defendants”) violated California insurance law and...more

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP

The E-Discovery Digest - October 2017

The eighth edition of The E-Discovery Digest focuses on recent decisions addressing the scope and application of the attorney-client privilege and work-product doctrine, spoliation, and discovery responses....more

Jones Day

Eastern District of Texas Latest Court to Criticize "Subject To" Language in Discovery Objections

Jones Day on

The Eastern District of Texas recently criticized a party's statement in its written discovery responses that it would produce documents "subject to" its objections. See Realpage, Inc. v. Enterprise Risk Control, LLC, No....more

Jones Day

Unmet Garmin Factor 3 Proves Fatal for Additional Discovery Request

Jones Day on

In Polygroup Ltd. v. Willis Electric Co., Ltd., the Patent Trial and Appeal Board denied a Patent Owner request for documents already provided in a co-pending lawsuit but restricted from use by a protective order....more

19 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide