News & Analysis as of

Email Discovery Attorney-Client Privilege

McGuireWoods LLP

The Surprising Danger of Including a Spouse on Email Communications

McGuireWoods LLP on

Most lawyers know that state statutes or common law doctrines often protect communications between spouses – although there is wide variation in such approaches. But there is a lurking danger that all of us should keep in...more

BCLP

Navigating a Security Incident - Communication “Dos” and “Don’ts”

BCLP on

Communication during a data breach is challenging in the best of circumstances, and control of information, especially early in a breach response, is critical. Below are some DOs and DON’Ts for communicating during a data...more

EDRM - Electronic Discovery Reference Model

May’s Notable Cases and Events in E-Discovery

[Editor’s Note: This article was first published May 15, 2024 and EDRM is grateful to Tom Paskowitz and Robert Keeling of our Trusted Partner, Sidley, for permission to republish. The opinions and positions are those of the...more

Woodruff Sawyer

Outside Director Communications: Maximizing the Potential to Protect Attorney-Client Privilege

Woodruff Sawyer on

Email communications can be a trap for unwary independent directors. The December 2020 In re WeWork Litigation decision illustrates the point, as discussed in this earlier blog. Specifically, directors who often use corporate...more

Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP

Massachusetts Court Shields Email Communication Seeking Legal Advice About Draft Press Release

Adversaries often challenge each other’s privilege calls in the thick of litigation, and sometimes those challenges are elevated to a court’s in camera review. In Governo Law Firm LLC v. CMBG3 Law LLC, et al., Judge Salinger,...more

McGuireWoods LLP

Court Explains How Employee-to-Employee Emails Can Deserve Privilege Protection

McGuireWoods LLP on

Because privilege logs necessarily contain logistical but not content-based information about withheld documents, adversaries sometimes challenge privilege protection because no lawyer sent or received a withheld document....more

McGuireWoods LLP

Delaware Federal Court Cleverly Finesses Frequently Arising Privilege Issue

McGuireWoods LLP on

Nearly every court requires that litigants analyze possible privilege and work product protection for each attachment included in a withheld email or other document. This understandable approach raises an obvious question...more

McGuireWoods LLP

S.D.N.Y. Deals With Spouses and Law Firm Emails: Part I

McGuireWoods LLP on

Most states have adopted some variation of what is called the "spousal privilege" or "marital privilege." Those usually appear in statutes or rules, and dramatically vary from state to state. For obvious reasons, spouses'...more

Proskauer - Minding Your Business

NY Court Re-Affirms Privilege Protection for Personal Emails Sent by Law Firm Partner on Firm Email Account

Citing new deposition testimony, actor Justin Theroux in a recent motion asked the New York Supreme Court to reconsider its December 2020 denial of Theroux’s motion to compel production of emails that his neighbor, Norman...more

McGuireWoods LLP

Copying a Lawyer on an Email Does Not Assure Privilege Protection, but That Lawyer Can Increase the Odds

McGuireWoods LLP on

Lawyers should remind their clients that copying a lawyer on an email does not automatically render the email privileged. But the story doesn't end there. In Dejewski v. National Beverage Corp., the court recited the...more

McGuireWoods LLP

Lawyers’ Failure to Consider Work Product Protection Prejudices Their Clients: Part I

McGuireWoods LLP on

The attorney-client privilege and the work product doctrine differ dramatically in their age, source, scope, strength and fragility. Lawyers must always consider both. But because clients, lawyers, and even courts usually use...more

Farrell Fritz, P.C.

Spoliation Of Evidence: When A Litigation Hold Is No Longer Privileged

Farrell Fritz, P.C. on

In New York, it is widely recognized that the duty to preserve documents arises once a party “reasonably anticipates litigation” (see Voom HD Holdings LLC v EchoStar Satellite, 93 AD3d 33, 41-42 [1st Dept 2012]). And so,...more

Morris James LLP

Chancery Holds Plaintiffs’ Emails with Counsel on Defendants’ Server Are Privileged Due to Application of Argentine Law

Morris James LLP on

Lynch v. Gonzalez, C.A. No. 2019-0356-MTZ (Del. Ch. Nov. 18, 2019). The plaintiff brought suit seeking confirmation that it validly acquired from defendants a majority ownership interest and the concomitant right to manage...more

Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP

Judge Kaplan Orders Return of Documents Inadvertently Produced

Ruling on a motion seeking the return of inadvertently produced privilege materials, Judge Kaplan elaborated on the meaning of “inadvertent” in the context of Massachusetts Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(5) and so-called...more

Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP

NY Appellate Court Slams “Egregious Litigation Misconduct” and “Improperly Accessed” Email Communications

When we hear about discovery abuses in litigation, we often think of overzealous lawyers using obstructionist tactics. Such behavior, however, rarely involves litigants “improperly accessing” the email communications of an...more

Porter Hedges LLP

"Texas Supreme Court: Attorney-Client Privilege Protects Communications With Employee-Experts"

Porter Hedges LLP on

In re City of Dickinson1 is an important case for businesses with an employee who will testify as an expert. The question for the court was which competing rule prevails: the rule protecting attorney-client communications or...more

Husch Blackwell LLP

Texas Supreme Court Rules Email As Attorney-Client Privileged

Husch Blackwell LLP on

Clients often make good testifying experts because they have specialized knowledge and experience in their industry. While normally emails between an attorney and a testifying expert are discoverable, what if the testifying...more

McGuireWoods LLP

Privilege and Work Protection For Lawyers' Communications With Third Parties and Reports of Those Communications: Part I

McGuireWoods LLP on

Lawyers' communications with the third parties generally cannot deserve privilege protection, but what about work product protection? In Booth v. Galveston Cty., Civ. A. No. 3:18-CV-00104, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 181063...more

McGuireWoods LLP

Court Criticizes Corporation's Sneaky "Tactic" to Avoid Discovery

McGuireWoods LLP on

Corporations claiming attorney-client privilege protection for their emails must prove that the emails were primarily motivated by their need for legal advice. Simply adding lawyers' names as direct or copy recipients does...more

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP

The E-Discovery Digest - March 2018

The ninth edition of The E-Discovery Digest focuses on recent decisions addressing the scope and application of the attorney-client privilege and work-product doctrine, spoliation, and discovery responses....more

Epiq

2017 eDiscovery Case Law Review

Epiq on

Electronic discovery cases that made headlines in 2017 featured well-known names such as Taylor Swift and Lynyrd Skynyrd, and reached all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court. As the year draws to a close, it’s a good time to...more

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP

The E-Discovery Digest - October 2017

The eighth edition of The E-Discovery Digest focuses on recent decisions addressing the scope and application of the attorney-client privilege and work-product doctrine, spoliation, and discovery responses....more

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP

The E-Discovery Digest - June 2017

The seventh edition of The E-Discovery Digest focuses on recent decisions addressing the scope and application of the attorney-client privilege and work-product doctrine, spoliation, and discovery responses....more

Proskauer - Minding Your Business

First Department Finds Work-Product Protection Not Waived by Storage of Documents on Company Laptop

On June 6, 2017, the First Department had an opportunity to apply—and reaffirm—last month’s decision in Peerenboom v. Marvel Entm’t, LLC, where the Court held that use of a company email system for personal purposes “does...more

Buchalter

Client Sends Privileged Email From iPhone That Triggers Inadvertent Production Rule

Buchalter on

Eight years ago the Second District Court of Appeal issued a decision establishing an attorney’s ethical duties upon receipt in discovery from opposing counsel of an inadvertently produced, privileged communication. State...more

30 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 2

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide