News & Analysis as of

Eminent Domain Judges

Roetzel & Andress

New Ohio Decision Clarifies Role of Judge and Jury in Eminent Domain Cases

Roetzel & Andress on

As a general rule, injuries that are shared in common with the general public are not compensable under Ohio eminent domain law. Ohio’s 4th District Court of Appeals recently ruled that the question of whether an injury is...more

Nossaman LLP

Judge Should Consider Constitutionality of a Dedication Requirement, Not the Jury

Nossaman LLP on

Every year or so, a new appellate court decision comes out addressing the proper role of the judge versus the jury on some certain eminent domain issue. Most recently, a trial court, appellate court and the California Supreme...more

Nossaman LLP

The Use of a Legal Issues Motion in Eminent Domain Proceedings

Nossaman LLP on

Eminent domain actions are unique in that "the court, rather than the jury, typically decides questions concerning the preconditions to recovery of a particular type of compensation, even if the determination turns on...more

Nossaman LLP

The Continuing Effort to Define the Line Between Court and Jury Roles in Eminent Domain

Nossaman LLP on

Eminent domain attorneys struggle with a concept foreign to most civil litigators: figuring out the roles of the judge and jury. Even most non-attorneys know the basic rule of trial: the jury is the "fact-finder." But in...more

4 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide