News & Analysis as of

Expert Testimony Antitrust Litigation

Latham & Watkins LLP

US Federal Judge: Efficiencies Analysis Inadmissible in Antitrust Merger Trial

Latham & Watkins LLP on

A recent US federal district court ruling finding a defendant’s evidence of cost savings inadmissible could change how efficiencies evidence is presented in merger cases. A US federal district court ruling last month has...more

McDermott Will & Emery

[Event] Wage The Battle To Win The War: Expert Challenges At Class Certification - September 24th, Chicago, Illinois

Certifying an antitrust class under Rule 23 has become a battle. In the last 20 years, courts have been changing the game around Rule 23 interpretation, and rigorous analysis at class certification has made briefing...more

McDermott Will & Emery

The Use of Expert Opinions in ‘Reverse-Payment’ Settlement Cases Under Actavis - King Drug Company of Florence, Inc., et al. v....

McDermott Will & Emery on

Applying its previous rulings in related litigation and interpreting FTC v. Actavis, 570 U.S. 756 (2013), the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania was tasked with determining whether to preclude expert...more

Robinson & Cole LLP

Use of Expert Testimony at Class Certification Stage Addressed By Third Circuit

Robinson & Cole LLP on

The Third Circuit recently joined the Seventh, Eighth, and Ninth Circuits in holding that, where a Daubert challenge is made to the use of expert testimony in support of class certification, the Daubert challenge must be...more

4 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide