News & Analysis as of

Expert Testimony Evidence Motions in Limine

Goldberg Segalla

Turbine Manufacturer’s Motion to Exclude Expert Opinion Testimony Denied

Goldberg Segalla on

U.S.  District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana Decedent James Grant Gooding was employed at various shipyards in Louisiana between 1970 and 1979. On March 4, 2020, he filed suit against a variety of premises...more

Stark & Stark

Federal Court Upholds Admissibility of Diffusion Tensor Imaging Testimony

Stark & Stark on

The United States District Court for the Southern District of New York provided another victory for the admissibility of diffusion tensor imaging. Defendant moved in limine to preclude the trial testimony of four of the...more

Goldberg Segalla

Naval Expert’s Testimony Limited on Duty to Warn Issue

Goldberg Segalla on

United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana, September 29, 2022 - The Callen Cortez (“Plaintiff”) matter has been previously reported by the Asbestos Case Tracker. At current issue is the...more

Hinshaw & Culbertson - Health Care

$50M Jury Verdict Overturned on Appeal Because Evidence of Autism Excluded at Trial: Hinshaw's Annual Guide to Key Illinois...

Did a trial court err in excluding evidence of subsequent formal diagnosis of autism when potentially alternative cause of current condition of minor? Julien Florez v. Northshore University Healthsystem d/b/a Evanston...more

Jones Day

ITC Excludes Expert Testimony for Violation of Ground Rules

Jones Day on

In a recently issued order, ALJ Lord granted-in-part and denied-in-part Respondents’ motion in limine to exclude certain testimony of Complainants’ expert. Certain Radio Frequency Microneedle Dermatological Treatment Devices...more

Jones Day

ITC Does Not Strictly Enforce the Daubert Standard for Expert Testimony

Jones Day on

In a recently issued pair of orders, ALJ Lord denied both Respondents’ and Complainants’ motions in limine to exclude certain expert testimony. Certain Radio Frequency Microneedle Dermatological Treatment Devices and...more

Carlton Fields

Does Your Expert Challenge Quack Like an Untimely Daubert Motion?

Carlton Fields on

In Frigaliment Importing Co. v. BNS Int’l Sales Corp., 190 F. Supp. 116 (S.D.N.Y. 1960), Judge Friendly famously asked “What is chicken?” A case decided last year raises the question, “What is a Daubert motion?”...more

Carlton Fields

Avoiding Trouble Following In Limine Rulings

Carlton Fields on

Trials often are preceded or interrupted by hearings on motions in limine, where parties attempt to limit the evidence or arguments that their opponents can utilize in the trial. These hearings are often fast-paced, with...more

Haight Brown & Bonesteel LLP

Re-Examining the Admissibility of Unpaid Medical Bills as Evidence

In Bermudez v. Ciolek (No. G049510, filed June 22, 2015), the California Court of Appeal, Fourth District, held unpaid medical bills, joined with expert testimony regarding their reasonableness, were properly admitted and...more

Carlton Fields

Forgetting Rule 403

Carlton Fields on

A recent case out of Montana, Peterson-Tuell v. First Student Transp., LLC, 339 P.3d 16 (Mont. Nov. 15, 2014), highlights the import of a Rule 403 challenge and of making your challenges and objections as comprehensive and...more

10 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide