News & Analysis as of

Franchise Agreements Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing

Lewitt Hackman

Franchisor 101: Charging Toward Arbitration

Lewitt Hackman on

A California federal court granted a motion to compel arbitration by retail franchisor Batteries Plus and its two executives, and dismissed a franchisee’s action alleging violations of the California Franchise Investment Law,...more

Lathrop GPM

California Federal Court Grants Retail Franchisor’s Motion to Compel Arbitration and Dismisses Action

Lathrop GPM on

A federal court in California recently granted a motion brought by a franchisor and two of its employees to compel arbitration and dismiss an action alleging violations of the California Franchise Investment Law, breach of...more

Lathrop GPM

Tenth Circuit Holds that Good Faith and Fair Dealing Claim Requires Expectation Created by Express Contract Terms

Lathrop GPM on

The Tenth Circuit has ruled in favor of KFC in a dispute with a franchisee alleging a breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. Kazi v. KFC US, LLC, 2023 WL 4983119 (10th Cir. Aug. 4, 2023)....more

Lewitt Hackman

Franchisor 101: Pizza Franchisor’s Release Overcooked

Lewitt Hackman on

A federal district court denied a pizza franchisor’s motion to dismiss a former franchisee’s complaint, finding the former franchisee sufficiently pleaded the franchisor coerced the franchisee into signing a general release....more

Lathrop GPM

Florida Federal Court Grants Franchisor’s Motion to Dismiss Breach of Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing Claims

Lathrop GPM on

A federal court in Florida recently granted a franchisor’s motion to dismiss a franchisee’s claim for breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, but allowed a claim for breach of contract to proceed....more

Lewitt Hackman

Franchisor 101: Transfer DQ’d

Lewitt Hackman on

A federal court in Wisconsin ruled that Dairy Queen did not breach a 1952 franchise agreement with a franchisee by requiring a prospective buyer of the franchise to sign an updated franchise agreement. Dairy Queen and a...more

Lewitt Hackman

Franchisee 101: Meet the New Boss

Lewitt Hackman on

A Tim Hortons franchisee sued the franchisor for breach of six franchise agreements and an area development agreement. Tim Hortons counterclaimed for breach of contract based on failure by the franchisee to meet the...more

Lewitt Hackman

Franchisor 101: Breaking Up Is Hard to Do

Lewitt Hackman on

A federal district court in Nevada partly denied a franchisor’s summary judgment motion on claims brought by a franchisee. IJL Midwest entered into several franchise agreements with a franchisor of a dating and...more

Lewitt Hackman

Franchisee 101: Kentucky Fried Impact Study

Lewitt Hackman on

Zubair Kazi operated a KFC franchise in Pueblo, Colorado since the 1980s. In 2019, KFC approved another individual to open a KFC restaurant in Pueblo. Kazi sued, claiming KFC breached its implied duty of good faith and fair...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

Federal Court Dismisses Case When Franchisee Association Fails to Satisfy Requirements to Establish Associational Standing

Foley & Lardner LLP on

A recent federal court decision explores the concept of associational standing, the right of an association of franchisees to sue a franchisor on behalf of its member franchises. In APFA Inc. v. UTAP Management, LLC, the...more

Lewitt Hackman

Franchisee 101: Planet Interference

Lewitt Hackman on

A federal court in New Hampshire found a multi-unit operator of five Planet Fitness gyms plausibly alleged the franchisor interfered with its business relationships and denied Planet Fitness’ motion for judgment on the...more

Lewitt Hackman

Franchisee 101: Franchisor’s Impact Study Fails to Influence Court

Lewitt Hackman on

A federal district court denied KFC’s defensive summary judgment motion, enabling its franchisee to go to trial on claims against KFC for breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing by opening a competing...more

Lewitt Hackman

Franchisor 101: Defaults Sink Bathroom Remodel Franchisee

Lewitt Hackman on

On competing motions for a temporary restraining order (“TRO”) by ReBath – a nationwide bathroom remodeling franchisor, and its terminated franchisee, ReBath prevailed in restraining the ex-franchisee’s further operations. A...more

Lewitt Hackman

Franchisee 101: Convenience Store Pays for Inconvenient Ordinance

Lewitt Hackman on

A federal court in New Jersey denied a 7-Eleven franchisee’s motion for a temporary restraining order. The franchisee sought an order enjoining 7-Eleven from enforcing various franchise agreement provisions, including charges...more

Lathrop GPM

The Franchise Memorandum - Issue # 261

Lathrop GPM on

Welcome to The Franchise Memorandum by Lathrop GPM. Below are summaries of recent legal developments of interest to franchisors. Fifth Circuit Reverses Trial Court’s Excusal of Area Representative’s Tardy Renewal Notice -...more

Lathrop GPM

The Franchise Memorandum - Issue # 256

Lathrop GPM on

Welcome to The Franchise Memorandum by Lathrop GPM, formerly known as The GPMemorandum. Periodically, The Franchise Memorandum focuses on topics primarily of interest to companies that use distributors and dealers rather than...more

Lewitt Hackman

FRANCHISEE 101: Recruitment Reprimand

Lewitt Hackman on

A Massachusetts state court ruled that real estate franchisor, Re/Max of New England (Franchisor), breached its franchise agreements, the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing and violated Massachusetts’ consumer...more

Lewitt Hackman

FRANCHISEE 101: Bar-B-Q Blues — A Tale of Friendship, Partnership, and Deceit

Lewitt Hackman on

A federal appeals court reversed dismissal of a claim against a barbeque restaurant franchisor. The court found that, despite having signed releases in favor of the franchisor, a former franchisee had valid claims for...more

Fox Rothschild LLP

Implied Covenant Of Good Faith Does Not Trump Express Terms

Fox Rothschild LLP on

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit upheld a New Jersey district court’s decision that 7-Eleven did not violate the New Jersey Franchise Practices Act (NJFPA) after the franchisor terminated a New Jersey...more

Troutman Pepper

Franchisor's Racial Animus Is Irrelevant in Determining Legality of Franchise Termination Under NJ Franchise Practices Act

Troutman Pepper on

In a recent win for franchisor 7-Eleven, Inc., the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit upheld a New Jersey district court’s ruling that 7-Eleven properly terminated its franchise agreements for cause based on the...more

Lewitt Hackman

FRANCHISOR 101: Selective Enforcement of Franchise Agreement Provisions

Lewitt Hackman on

A franchisor's ability to set renewal terms can bind franchisees to terms in a later franchise agreement before the renewal agreement even exists. In a recent case, a franchisor could enforce a hypothetical non-compete...more

Lewitt Hackman

Focused on Franchise Law - March 2014

Lewitt Hackman on

FRANCHISOR 101: Franchisee Not Bound by Arbitration Provision - In March 2013, Edison Subs, LLC, a Subway franchisee/transferee, filed a complaint in New Jersey against Subway and Aliya Patel (the original...more

22 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide