About Court Report: Each week we will report briefly on recently filed biotech and pharma cases. AbbVie Inc. v. Hetero USA Inc. et al. 1:13-cv-00852; filed May 15, 2013 in the District Court of Delaware - •...more
About Court Report: Each week we will report briefly on recently filed biotech and pharma cases. Eisai R&D Management Co., Ltd. v. Rea - 1:13-cv-00548; filed May 2, 2013 in the Eastern District of...more
About Court Report: Each week we will report briefly on recently filed biotech and pharma cases. Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research v. ARUP Laboratories, Inc. - Infringement of U.S. Patent Nos....more
The Australian Government has continued with the trend of reviewing Australian patent law by commissioning a review of laws relating to patents for medicines ie pharmaceutical patents. The Pharmaceutical Patents Review Panel...more
On March 25, 2013, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral argument in Federal Trade Commission v. Actavis, Inc. (Docket No. 12-416). The Actavis case centers around the debate over the type of antitrust analysis that should apply...more
On March 25, 2012, the Supreme Court heard oral argument on the legality of “reverse payment” or “pay for delay” agreements between brand-name and generic drug manufacturers....more
In a landmark judgment delivered on April 1, 2013, the Supreme Court of India dismissed an appeal by Novartis AG, a Swiss pharmaceutical giant, to win patent protection in India for its cancer drug Glivec. The polarizing...more
On March 25, 2013, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral argument in FTC v. Actavis, Inc.,1 which is on appeal from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. This case addresses a type of patent litigation settlement...more
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Federal Trade Commission v. Actavis (the caption for what was Federal Trade Commission v. Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc. in the 11th Circuit opinion below) last Monday, with Deputy...more
In This Issue: Millennium Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Fresenius Kabi USA LLC et al.; Trustee's of the University of Pennsylvania v. St. Jude Children's Research Hospital; and Pfizer Inc. et al. v. Lupin Ltd. et al.....more
In This Issue: Supreme Court - Supreme Court Finds That “First Sale” Doctrine Applies to Works Patents - Joint Actors as It Relates to Method Claim Infringement; Federal Circuit Ruling Clears Way...more
Originally published in Wrays on March 27, 2013. On 15 March 2013, the Australian Federal Court upheld Eli Lilly's patent for the active compound in their highly successful product ZYPREXA®. Lilly successfully...more
The Supreme Court’s ruling in Federal Trade Commission v. Actavis, Inc., will almost certainly have major implications for the viability of Federal Trade Commission and private suits alleging that pay-for-delay settlements...more
The U.S. Supreme Court today heard arguments over whether big pharmaceutical companies can pay generic drug manufacturers to delay their entry into the marketplace....more
[Ed. The Supreme Court heard oral argument today in Federal Trade Commission v. Watson Pharmaceuticals. While Patent Docs will provide analysis regarding the oral argument in a subsequent post, we provide the following...more
In This Issue: AstraZeneca AB et al. v. Watson Laboratories, Inc. - Florida et al.; Pharmacia & Upjohn Co. LLC et al. v. Apotex, Inc. et al.; Intendis GmbH et al. v. Glenmark Generics Ltd. et al.; and Boehringer...more
In This Issue: Apotex, Inc. et al. v. Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd. et al.; Bayer Intellectual Property GmbH et al. v. Rea; Janssen Products, L.P. et al. v. Hetero Drugs, Ltd. et al.; Novartis Pharmaceuticals...more
Last week, Senator Al Franken (D-MN) was joined by Senators David Vitter (R-LA), Dick Durbin (D-IL), Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH), and Bernie Sanders (I-VT) in introducing S. 204, the "Fair and Immediate Release of Generic Drugs...more
In This Issue: G.D. Searle LLC et al. v. Lupin Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al. and AbbVie Inc. et al. v. The Kennedy Trust Rheumatology Research....more
Last April, Abbott Laboratories filed a Citizen Petition with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, asking the agency to refrain from accepting biosimilar applications under the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act...more
Originally published in WP Thompson & Co. on March 4, 2013. On 26 February 2013, the UK government announced a proposed change to the Patents Act to exempt clinical and field trials, as well as "health technology...more
In This Issue: Eli Lilly and Company et al. v. Genentech, Inc. et al.; Depomed Inc. v. Watson Laboratories Inc. - Florida et al.; Eli Lilly and Company v. Accord Healthcare Inc., USA; Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al....more
On the first day of February, the Federal Circuit rejected Impax's efforts to get out from under a preliminary injunction in a case captioned In re Cyclobenzaprine Hydrochloride Extended-Release Capsule Patent Litigation. ...more
Par PharmaceuticalPar/Paddock, one of the generic drug company defendants in FTC v. Actavis Inc. et al. (the "reverse payment" ANDA settlement case now before the Supreme Court) filed its reponsive brief last week. In it,...more
In This Issue: Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp. v. Actavis LLC et al.; Precision Biosciences Inc. et al. v. Cellectis S.A. et al.; Bayer Pharma AG v. Warner Chilcott Co., LLC et al.; Promega Corp. et al. v. Life...more
JD Supra gets your content noticed, increases your visibility and makes your marketing efforts hassle free...
Learn More or Schedule a demo