News & Analysis as of

Income Taxes › Supreme Court of the United States

Income taxes are taxes that are collected on the individual earnings of persons or entities. Depending on the jurisdiction, income taxes are calculated and collected in a variety of ways. Some tax systems collect... more +
Income taxes are taxes that are collected on the individual earnings of persons or entities. Depending on the jurisdiction, income taxes are calculated and collected in a variety of ways. Some tax systems collect income taxes based on a progressive scheme, while others may utilize a proportional or regressive framework. less -
Allen Barron, Inc.

How Did Moore v. United States Change U.S. Tax Law?

Allen Barron, Inc. on

We have been waiting several months for the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) to render a decision in Moore v. United States. Initially, our questions focused on the issue of “realized or unrealized income” and...more

Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP

The Supreme Court Has Saved the Tax Code for Now and Left Room for Moore

Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP on

In Moore v. United States, the Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the mandatory repatriation tax (MRT), saving a significant portion of the current tax code for now. The question in front of the Court was whether...more

Farrell Fritz, P.C.

Wealth Tax Fight Marches On

Farrell Fritz, P.C. on

Proponents and opponents of proposed “wealth tax” legislation alike watched the Supreme Court carefully as it heard oral arguments for, and subsequently decided Moore v. United States on June 20, 2024. The crux of the Moores’...more

Jones Day

Supreme Court Upholds the Mandatory Repatriation Tax in Moore v. United States

Jones Day on

The U.S. Supreme Court has affirmed the Ninth Circuit's decision in Moore v. United States, upholding the constitutionality of the mandatory repatriation tax enacted in 2017....more

BakerHostetler

[Podcast] Implications of Supreme Court’s Tax Decision in Moore v. United States

BakerHostetler on

A team of BakerHostetler lawyers, led by Partners Andrew Grossman and Jeff Paravano, represented clients Charles and Kathleen Moore at the Supreme Court, arguing that realization is required for federal taxation of income...more

Holland & Knight LLP

Moore Thoughts: An Incremental Opinion from the U.S. Supreme Court

Holland & Knight LLP on

The U.S. Supreme Court on June 20, 2024, ruled 7-2 that Section 965 of the Internal Revenue Code, as revised by the law known as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, is constitutional. The issue presented to the Court in Moore v....more

Williams Mullen

No Moore Waiting - Supreme Court Upholds Mandatory Repatriation Tax

Williams Mullen on

On June 20, the U.S. Supreme Court released its opinion in the closely watched case of Moore v. United States. In a 7-2 decision, the court upheld the constitutionality of the mandatory repatriation tax (MRT), also referred...more

Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP

Doing less with Moore: Supreme Court upholds section 965 transition tax in Moore v. United States

Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP on

Almost exactly a year after it shook the tax world by granting certiorari, on June 20, 2024, the Supreme Court issued its opinion in Moore v. United States, No. 22-800. By a vote of 7-2, the Court upheld the constitutionality...more

Farella Braun + Martel LLP

Taxation of Realized, but Undistributed, Gains or (What Moore Means)

Farella Braun + Martel LLP on

The Wall Street Journal, following the Supreme Court's decision in Moore v. United States, claims that the five-justice majority opinion “open[s] the door to taxing unrealized gains.” Query whether the Moore decision simply...more

McDermott Will & Emery

Supreme Court Rules Against Taxpayers in IRC Section 965 Case

McDermott Will & Emery on

On June 20, 2024, the Supreme Court of the United States issued a 7-2 opinion in Moore v. United States, 602 U.S. __ (2024), ruling in favor of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS)....more

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP

Supreme Court Decides Moore v. United States

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP on

On June 20, 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court decided Moore v. United States, No. 22-800, holding that the Mandatory Repatriation Tax (MRT) — a provision in a 2017 tax reform law — could constitutionally impose a one-time...more

Proskauer - Tax Talks

Supreme Court Rules on Moore v. U.S. – Upholds Mandatory Repatriation Tax

Proskauer - Tax Talks on

On June 20, 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled 7-2 that the so called mandatory repatriation tax under Internal Revenue Code Section 965 (“MRT”) is constitutional. Justice Kavanaugh wrote the majority opinion...more

Lewis Roca

Supreme Court Decision in Connelly v. United States

Lewis Roca on

On June 6, 2024, the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in in Connelly, As Executor of the Estate of Connelly v. United States, (602 US ________). The decision involves the application of the federal estate tax...more

Rivkin Radler LLP

Missing the Tax Court’s 90-Day Deficiency Deadline – Now What?

Rivkin Radler LLP on

Over the years, I have observed there is only one thing that a taxpayer fears more than being notified by the IRS that their income tax return for a particular taxable year has been selected for audit, and that is being...more

Kohrman Jackson & Krantz LLP

Unrealized Income Under Scrutiny: Will SCOTUS Unleash Chaos on the US Tax Code?

Kohrman Jackson & Krantz LLP on

In December 2023, the Supreme Court considered the fundamental question: “How is income defined?” Moore v. United States centered on the question of taxation of unrealized income. Unrealized income is defined as a gain that...more

Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP

Eager for Moore?

Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP on

On December 5, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments on Moore v. United States, which is potentially the next landmark tax case on the meaning of income under the Sixteenth Amendment....more

Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP

Moore Bark Than Bite? Supreme Court Weighs In

Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP on

Unless you have been living under a rock—as we tax lawyers are wont to do—you have probably been following Moore v. United States, which we last discussed.  On December 5, the tax community stepped into the spotlight...more

Allen Barron, Inc.

Could an Upcoming Supreme Court Case Significantly Change US Tax Law?

Allen Barron, Inc. on

Could a Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) case significantly change US tax law? We are closely watching the developments in Moore v United States as it carries significant issues regarding “realized” versus...more

Proskauer - Proskauer For Good

Proskauer Files Amicus Brief Before the U.S. Supreme Court on Behalf of the American College of Tax Counsel

Proskauer - Proskauer For Good on

On October 23, 2023, Proskauer attorneys submitted an amicus brief in connection with the U.S. Supreme Court case of Moore v. United States[1] on behalf of the American College of Tax Counsel—a nonprofit professional...more

Rivkin Radler LLP

Supreme Court to Decide: No Realization Means No Moore Income Tax?

Rivkin Radler LLP on

Many of you, perhaps most, may have read about a case that will be heard by the U.S. Supreme Court during its current term. The case, Moore v. United States, comes out of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Supreme Court...more

Miller Canfield

Will the Supreme Court Invalidate One or More Sections of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act?

Miller Canfield on

A tax case pending in the United States Supreme Court, Moore v. United States, may cause a cataclysmic change in the federal income tax. The 16th Amendment to the United States Constitution empowers Congress to impose “taxes...more

Bilzin Sumberg

A Transition to What? SCOTUS Set to Decide the Fate of IRC 965

Bilzin Sumberg on

The U.S. Supreme Court (“SCOTUS”) has decided to hear a case (Moore v. U.S., No. 22-800 ) where individual taxpayers owned shares in a controlled foreign corporation (“CFC”) and were subject to the so-called “transition tax”...more

Kohrman Jackson & Krantz LLP

Move Over TikTok, the Tax Man May Be Snooping on You, Too

Kohrman Jackson & Krantz LLP on

In a rare unanimous opinion, the U.S. Supreme Court recently confirmed that existing law allows the IRS to probe your bank records, without ever notifying you. Under the applicable statute, the Court concluded the IRS is not...more

Rivkin Radler LLP

Supreme Court Upholds IRS Collections Summons Without Notice

Rivkin Radler LLP on

The Supremes- The Constitution has figured prominently in the news of late. In the days preceding the initial discussions among members of the Administration and the Congressional leadership regarding the debt ceiling,...more

Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP

Supreme Court Hands Taxpayers a Victory in FBAR Penalty Case

Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP on

Taxpayers recently won a significant victory at the Supreme Court in a penalty case involving a non-willful failure to file a Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts (“FBAR”) under the Bank Secrecy Act (the “BSA”)....more

150 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 6
Next »

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide