News & Analysis as of

Motion for JMOL

Fish & Richardson

Texas Patent Litigation Monthly Wrap-Up: March 2023

Fish & Richardson on

March's Texas Patent Litigation Monthly Wrap-Up covers decisions addressing post-verdict JMOL, the point at which cases become exceptional, and the standard for amending invalidity contentions, among other issues....more

Fish & Richardson

Texas Patent Litigation Monthly Wrap-Up - October 2021

Fish & Richardson on

This post summarizes some of the significant developments related to patent litigation in federal district courts of Texas for the month of October 2021....more

Haug Partners LLP

Are Biopharma Genus Patent Claims Dead?

Haug Partners LLP on

A recent Supreme Court petition for certiorari alleges that genus claims are no longer viable under the Federal Circuit’s recent application of enablement and written description law.The petition has huge ramifications not...more

Knobbe Martens

Large Quantity of Routine Experimentation Can Be “Undue Experimentation”

Knobbe Martens on

IDENIX PHARMACEUTICALS LLC v. GILEAD SCIENCES INC. Before Prost, Newman, and Wallach. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware. Summary: Synthesizing and screening tens of thousands of...more

Knobbe Martens

Federal Circuit Review - April 2019

Knobbe Martens on

Just Because Something May Result From a Prior Art Teaching Does Not Make it Inherent in that Teaching - In Personal Web Technologies, LLC v. Apple, Inc., Appeal No. 2018-1599, the Federal Circuit clarified that the mere...more

Fox Rothschild LLP

Judge Andrews Denies Both Plaintiff And Defendant’s JMOL Motions And Plaintiff’s Motion For New Trial On Damages Following Jury...

Fox Rothschild LLP on

By Memorandum and Order entered by The Honorable Richard G. Andrews in AVM Technologies, LLC v. Intel Corp., Civil Action No. 15-0033-RGA-MPT (D.Del. August 14, 2018), the Court denied Defendant’s Motion for Judgment as a...more

Fox Rothschild LLP

Judge Sleet Denies SurgiQuest’s JMOL Motion After Finding Evidence Was Sufficient To Support Jury’s Verdict Of False Advertising...

Fox Rothschild LLP on

By Memorandum Opinion entered by The Honorable Gregory M. Sleet in SurgiQuest v. Lexion Medical, LLC., Civil Action No. 14-382-GMS (D.Del. May 16, 2018), the Court denied Plaintiff/Counterclaim-Defendant SurgiQuest’s renewed...more

McDermott Will & Emery

Concrete Solution to Computer Problem Is Patent Eligible

Affirming a series of district court rulings, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit found claims directed to software menus that display a limited subset of commonly used functions—useful in conserving space on...more

Fox Rothschild LLP

Chief Judge Stark Grants Defendant’s Renewed JMOL Motion After Finding Patent-In-Suit Invalid For Lack Of Enablement

Fox Rothschild LLP on

By Opinion entered by The Honorable Leonard P. Stark in Idenix Pharmaceuticals LLC et al. v. Gilead Sciences, Inc., Civil Action No. 14-846-LPS (D.Del. February 16, 2018), the District Court granted in part Defendant Gilead...more

Knobbe Martens

Arctic Cat Inc. v. Bombardier Recreational Products Inc.

Knobbe Martens on

Federal Circuit Summaries - Before Moore, Plager, and Stoll. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. Summary: In challenging compliance with the marking requirement of §...more

Jaburg Wilk

Arizona Reverses Award of Punitive Damages in Bad Faith Case Again

Jaburg Wilk on

The Holding - In Preciado v.Young American Insurnace Company, 2017 WL 2805631 ( Ariz.App . June 29, 2017) (unpublished), the Arizona Court of Appeals held the trial court erroneously failed to grant an Insurer’s motion for...more

Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt PC

2017 Supreme Court and Precedential Patent Cases From the Federal Circuit, With Some Significant Cases from 2016

Arbitration - Waymo v. Uber Technologies, 870 F.3d 1342 (Fed. Cir. 2017) - Waymo sued Uber and others for trade secret misappropriation and patent infringement. Uber contends that Waymo should be compelled to...more

Proskauer - Whistleblower Defense

California Federal Court Upholds $8 Million Jury Verdict In Former General Counsel’s Whistleblower Lawsuit

Recently, a California federal court denied the defendant–employer’s motion for a new trial, upholding the jury’s $7.96 million verdict finding that the Company terminated its former general counsel for reporting alleged...more

13 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide