News & Analysis as of

Online Gaming Inter Partes Review (IPR) Proceeding

McDermott Will & Emery

Challenge to PTAB’s Finding of Non-Obviousness Fails to Pay Out

McDermott Will & Emery on

Addressing whether the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) ran afoul of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) in finding that a dependent claim was valid despite the patent owner’s lack of validity arguments beyond those...more

Weintraub Tobin

Online Gaming Case Addresses Trigger For One-Year IPR Filing Deadline

Weintraub Tobin on

When sued for patent infringement, a defendant can still petition for inter partes review (“IPR”) of the asserted patent at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) if the petition is filed within one year of...more

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP

PTAB Institutes IPR Despite Potential Time Bar to Petition

On October 6, 2017, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (the “Board”) granted institution of inter partes review under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) of claims directed to an online game. Notably, institution was granted despite the Board...more

3 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide