News & Analysis as of

Patents 3M Company

Jones Day

Board Denies Follow-On Petition

Jones Day on

In recent decision 3M Company v. Bay Materials, the Board denied 3M Company’s (“Petitioner”) second Petition for inter partes review (“Second Petition”) after exercising its discretion under § 314(a) and finding that each of...more

Linda Liu & Partners

Reward and Remuneration to the Inventors of Service Invention completed by the Subsidiary but Applied for Patent by the Parent...

Linda Liu & Partners on

The first paragraph of Article 15 of the Patent Law stipulates: "The organization which has been granted patent rights shall reward the inventor or designer of a service invention-creation; upon implementation of the patent...more

Robins Kaplan LLP

AstraZeneca AB v. Mylan Pharms. Inc.

Robins Kaplan LLP on

BECAUSE DELAWARE WAS AN IMPROPER VENUE FOR DEFENDANT MYLAN, AND DEFENDANT 3M DEMONSTRATED THAT VARIOUS FACTORS WEIGHED IN FAVOR OF A TRANSFER, THE CASE WAS TRANSFERRED TO THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA. Case...more

Knobbe Martens

Parroting Language of Venue Statute Is Not Enough to Avoid Dismissal

Knobbe Martens on

WESTECH AEROSOL CORPORATION v. 3M COMPANY - Before Lourie, Mayer, and Reyna. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington. Summary: To establish proper venue, a plaintiff must...more

4 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide