News & Analysis as of

Patents AT&T

Fox Rothschild LLP

Chief Judge Stark Denies Defendants’ Motion Seeking Litigation Funding-Related Discovery In Patent Infringement Action

Fox Rothschild LLP on

By Memorandum Order entered by The Honorable Leonard P. Stark in United Access Technologies, LLC v. AT&T Corp. et al., Civil Action No. 11-338-LPS (D.Del. June 12, 2020), the Court denied the motion of Defendants AT&T Corp.,...more

McDermott Will & Emery

All in the Family: Prior Patent License Implicitly Grants License to Asserted Patent

McDermott Will & Emery on

The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed a district court dismissal, finding that a patent license implicitly licensed all parents and continuations that disclosed the same invention as the explicitly licensed...more

Knobbe Martens

Arguments During Prosecution Can Limit the Scope of a Coined Term with No Ordinary and Customary Meaning

Knobbe Martens on

IRIDESCENT NETWORKS, INC. v. AT&T MOBILITY, LLC - Before Prost, Reyna and Taranto. Appeal from the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas - Iridescent sued AT&T and Ericsson for infringement of a patent...more

Knobbe Martens

Raniere v. Microsoft Corporation

Knobbe Martens on

Federal Circuit Summaries - Before Lourie, O’Malley, and Wallach. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Summary: When a case is dismissed with prejudice for lack of standing,...more

McDermott Will & Emery

PTAB May Institute Re-Examination Even Where Requester Wants It Denied

The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit found that the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) properly instituted an inter partes re-examination even though the requester had asked it to deny institution and had...more

Knobbe Martens

PTAB Grants Joinder of Time-Barred Petitioner to IPR after Settlement with Original Petitioner

Knobbe Martens on

The PTAB granted joinder of a time-barred petitioner to an IPR trial after the patent owner settled its dispute with the original petitioner in AT&T Services, Inc. v. Convergent Media Solutions, LLC, IPR2017-01237, Paper 10...more

Knobbe Martens

Federal Circuit Review | April 2017

Knobbe Martens on

Patentee’s Unnecessarily Broad Prosecution Disclaimer Affirmed by Federal Circuit - In Technology Properties Limited LLC v. Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd., Appeal Nos. 2016-1306, -1307, -1309, -1310, -1311, the Federal...more

McDermott Will & Emery

Settlement Agreement May Be Used as Evidence of Damages

Addressing evidentiary issues, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit agreed with the district court that a settlement agreement related to the patent at issue is admissible as proof of a reasonable royalty. Prism...more

McDermott Will & Emery

Notice of an Order Intending Final Judgment, Even If Erroneous, Triggers Appeal - Two-Way Media, LLC v. AT&T Inc.

Addressing the requirements for extending and reopening the time to appeal under Fed. R. App. Pro. 4(a), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed a district court’s denial to either extend or reopen the time...more

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP

IP Newsflash - January 2015 #3

FEDERAL CIRCUIT CASES - Akin Gump Wins Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement - Akin Gump obtained a significant victory on summary judgment for HTC and AT&T in a patent infringement case against Adaptix, Inc., an...more

10 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide