JONES DAY TALKS®: Consumer Protection Enforcement Changes Likely After SCOTUS AMG Decision
Key Takeaways from the AMG Capital Management v. FTC Decision
On January 18, 2019, in Amgen v. Sanofi, the ongoing litigation concerning Sanofi and Regeneron’s Praluent® (alirocumab) product, Judge Andrews of the District of Delaware denied Sanofi’s motion for summary judgment that the...more
As we previously reported, Amgen is seeking en banc review of the Federal Circuit panel decision vacating a permanent injunction that would have otherwise prohibited the sale of Sanofi and Regeneron’s Praluent® (alirocumab)...more
In Amgen v. Sanofi, the Federal Circuit held that evidence that first came into existence after the priority date may be considered in determining whether a genus patent claim satisfies the written description requirement...more
In October, a Federal Circuit panel vacated a permanent injunction (which the Federal Circuit had earlier stayed pending appeal) that would have otherwise prohibited the sale of Sanofi and Regeneron’s Praluent® (alirocumab)...more
As we reported earlier this year, on January 6, 2017, Judge Robinson of the District of Delaware entered a permanent injunction prohibiting the sale of Sanofi and Regeneron’s Praluent® (alirocumab) product after the...more
On February 8, the Federal Circuit issued a stay of the permanent injunction granted against the sale of Sanofi and Regeneron’s Praluent® (alirocumab). The injunction was to have become effective on February 21, 2017, but as...more
For the past few years, Amgen has been asserting patents in a litigation against Sanofi and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals in the District of Delaware to prevent them from selling Praluent® (alirocumab), a biologic that competes...more