News & Analysis as of

Pipelines Limitation Periods

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

Actions relatives à l’environnement : Décision de la Cour d’appel de l’Alberta sur la prorogation des délais de prescription

Le 21 février 2024, la Cour d’appel de l’Alberta (la « CAA ») a rendu sa décision dans l’affaire Paramount Resources Ltd. v. Grey Owl Engineering Ltd., laquelle constitue la plus récente décision sur l’application possible de...more

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

When to Extend the Limitation Period in Environmental Claims: Alberta Court of Appeal Issues Its Latest Ruling

The Alberta Court of Appeal issued its decision in Paramount Resources Ltd. v. Grey Owl Engineering Ltd. on February 21, 2024. This decision represents the latest pronouncement on the potential application of section 218 of...more

Bennett Jones LLP

Alberta Court Declines to Extend Limitation Period for Contamination Claim

Bennett Jones LLP on

Section 218 of Alberta's Environmental Protection and Enhancement Act, RSA 2000, c E-12 (EPEA) is not available to extend the limitation period for a party liable for remediation costs to make claims against other alleged...more

Morgan Lewis

FERC Signals Intention to Closely Scrutinize Late Interventions

Morgan Lewis on

Movants must clear high hurdle once parties reach settlement in principle. On March 9, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or the Commission) issued an order in Maritimes & Northeast Pipeline, LLC (Maritimes...more

4 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide