News & Analysis as of

Supreme Court of the United States › Non-Public Information

The United States Supreme Court is the highest court of the United States and is charged with interpreting federal law, including the United States Constitution. The Court's docket is largely discretionary... more +
The United States Supreme Court is the highest court of the United States and is charged with interpreting federal law, including the United States Constitution. The Court's docket is largely discretionary with only a limited number of cases granted review each term.  The Court is comprised of one chief justice and eight associate justices, who are nominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate to hold lifetime positions. less -
Morrison & Foerster LLP

Top 5 SEC Enforcement Developments for April 2024

Morrison & Foerster LLP on

Each month, we publish a roundup of the most important SEC enforcement developments for busy in-house lawyers and compliance professionals. This month, we examine: •The SEC’s first “Shadow Trading” trial; •SCOTUS’s...more

Allen Matkins

SEC Alleges Tipper Received Or Expected A Benefit, But Fails To Identify The Benefit

Allen Matkins on

In Dirks v. SEC, 463 U.S. 646 (1983), the United States Supreme Court found that a tippee may be liable for trading on the basis of material, nonpublic information if he or she knows that the tipper disclosed inside...more

Vinson & Elkins LLP

Insider Trading Update: Recent Developments And Compliance Risks

Vinson & Elkins LLP on

Two separate, recent lines of cases have continued to shape the circumstances under which insider trading prosecutions can be brought, and as a result, the insider trading compliance risks faced by companies. First, the...more

Perkins Coie

US Supreme Court Remands Blaszczak Insider Trading Case Back to the Second Circuit

Perkins Coie on

The U.S. Supreme Court recently cast doubt on the criminal convictions of the one-time “King of Political Intelligence” David Blaszczak and three others for their role in an insider trading scheme. The Court’s action could...more

Robins Kaplan LLP

Financial Daily Dose 10.21.2019 | Top Story: Four Drug Companies Reach Last-minute Deal to Avoid Start of Federal Opioid Trial

Robins Kaplan LLP on

A last-minute deal between defendants McKesson, Cardinal Health, AmerisourceBergen, and Teva and plaintiffs’ attorneys means that multidistrict opioid epidemic litigation set to kick off in Ohio federal court today will not...more

Whitman Legal Solutions, LLC

Orchestra Performances and Basic Honesty Analysis in Rule 10b-5 Cases

Whitman Legal Solutions, LLC on

In Janus Capital Group Inc. v. First Derivative Traders, the US Supreme Court appeared to apply a similar standard to Rule 10b-5 securities fraud cases. Under Janus, the Court appeared to hold that only someone who has the...more

King & Spalding

Timely Reminders to Avoid Inadvertent Tipping Liability

King & Spalding on

Just in time for the annual season of work holiday parties and family gatherings, the United States Supreme Court unanimously confirmed that leaking material non-public information to a close relative who then trades in...more

Lowndes

7 Things You Should Consider To Avoid Criminal Prosecution

Lowndes on

In its first insider trading ruling in almost 20 years, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld a ruling by the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals that a person can be held criminally liable for passing inside information to a friend or...more

Polsinelli

Is That What Friends (and Family) Are For? Supreme Court Resolves Circuit Split in Insider Trading Case But Questions Remain

Polsinelli on

A recent Supreme Court decision provides new guidance in the area of insider trading liability without personal benefit, and resolves an existing split between the Ninth Circuit and Second Circuit Court of Appeals. In Salman...more

Pierce Atwood LLP

Supreme Court Lowers Burden in Insider Trading Prosecutions

Pierce Atwood LLP on

On December 6, 2016, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its first insider trading decision in nearly two decades unanimously affirming the Ninth Circuit and holding that an insider’s “gift” of confidential information to a...more

Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP

The Supreme Court Restores Implied Benefit Theory in Insider Trading Prosecutions of Downstream Tippees

Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP on

Friends and relatives of corporate insiders who knowingly receive and trade on inside information now confront greater exposure for federal securities laws violations. On December 6, 2016, the Supreme Court held in United...more

Holland & Knight LLP

Supreme Court Clarifies Insider Trading

Holland & Knight LLP on

The U.S. Supreme Court has clarified what constitutes illegal insider trading by making it easier for the government to bring such cases. In a Dec. 6, 2016, unanimous decision in Salman v. United States, the court held that...more

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP

United States Supreme Court Clarifies Standard for Insider Trading

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP on

Today, the United States Supreme Court held that an individual may be convicted of insider trading after receiving an investment tip from an insider who obtained no direct financial benefit from the disclosure. In a unanimous...more

Goodwin

Supreme Court Weighs In On Insider Trading Law – Finds Giving Gifts Can Be Its Own Reward

Goodwin on

In its decision issued yesterday in Salman v. United States, 580 U.S. __ (2016), the United States Supreme Court unanimously affirmed a criminal insider trading conviction even though there was no evidence that the tipper...more

King & Spalding

In Salman v. United States, Supreme Court Holds that the Government Need Not Prove that an Insider Received a Pecuniary Benefit in...

King & Spalding on

On December 6, 2016, the Supreme Court issued a unanimous decision in Salman v. United States, holding that a tipper’s gift of confidential, inside information to a trading relative constituted a sufficient personal benefit...more

Morgan Lewis

The Salman Decision-The Supreme Court Weighs in on Insider Trading

Morgan Lewis on

Significant decision comes after nearly two decades of silence. For the first time in nearly 20 years, the US Supreme Court has weighed in on insider trading law and handed a victory to the government and its insider...more

Burr & Forman

Supremes Reaffirm Dirks Gifting Theory of Insider Trading; Limit Newman

Burr & Forman on

A unanimous Supreme Court reaffirmed the “gifting” theory of insider trading under Dirks and rejected Newman “to the extent” it required more. The Court’s long-standing rule in Dirks v. SEC, 463 U.S. 646, 664 (1983)...more

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP

United States Supreme Court Clarifies Standard for Insider Trading

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP on

Yesterday, the United States Supreme Court held that an individual may be convicted of insider trading after receiving an investment tip from an insider who obtained no direct financial benefit from the disclosure. In a...more

Proskauer Rose LLP

Supreme Court Reaffirms Personal-Benefit Requirement for Insider Trading

Proskauer Rose LLP on

The Supreme Court confirmed today that the "personal benefit" required to establish a claim for insider trading can consist of making a gift of material, nonpublic information to a family member or friend and that an exchange...more

Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP

Supreme Court Justices Appear Hesitant to Narrow the Scope of Insider Trading Liability

Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP on

Since the Second Circuit Court of Appeals’ December 2014 decision in United States v. Newman, the government’s ability to aggressively pursue insider trading cases involving tipping has been in doubt. But, on October 5, the...more

20 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide