News & Analysis as of

Summary Judgment Commercial Court

Freiberger Haber LLP

Guaranty Provision Requiring Some Additional Performance Obligations Held Insufficient to Defeat Motion for Summary Judgment In...

Freiberger Haber LLP on

In past articles, we have examined a motion for summary judgment in lieu of a complaint under CPLR § 3213. Today, we take another look at this statute by examining BBM3, LLC v. Vosotas, 2023 N.Y. Slip Op. 02279 (1st Dept. ...more

Farrell Fritz, P.C.

Narrow Escape of Expedited Judgment Under CPLR 3213 Due to Ambiguous Guaranty

Farrell Fritz, P.C. on

As readers of this blog are aware the CPLR 3213 motion for summary judgment in lieu of complaint can be a powerful tool to secure an expedited judgment, “meld[ing] pleading and motion practice into one step, allowing a...more

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP

Judgment Creditors Beware: Moving For Contempt May Be Within Reach, But Difficult To Grasp

In the New York County Commercial Division, Justice David B. Cohen’s ruling in B&M Kingstone, LLC v. Mega Int’l Comm. Bank Ltd., 2022 NY Slip Op. 30481(U) (Sup. Ct. N.Y. Cnty. 2022) makes clear that New York courts can compel...more

Farrell Fritz, P.C.

Oral Modifications to Written Agreements? Better Get Them in Writing Says the Commercial Division

Farrell Fritz, P.C. on

In Castle Restoration & Constr., Inc. v Castle Restoration, LLC, Suffolk County Commercial Division Justice Elizabeth H. Emerson refused to enforce an oral agreement that allegedly modified a prior written agreement between...more

Farrell Fritz, P.C.

New Supreme Court Rule on Summary Judgment Motions: “Just the Facts, Ma’am”

Farrell Fritz, P.C. on

Practitioners often choose to practice in the Commercial Division because of its well-documented efficiencies.  Thus, many were happy to hear that Chief Administrative Judge Larry Marks issued Administrative Order 270/2020...more

Goodwin

Litigation Insights - July 2021

Goodwin on

FOREWORD - On behalf of the new and expanding Goodwin London litigation team I am delighted to welcome you to our first ever ‘Litigation Insights’: a series of quarterly updates on important and interesting developments...more

Farrell Fritz, P.C.

Defenses and Counterclaims In a CPLR 3213 Action Are Only Successful If They’re “Inseparable”

Farrell Fritz, P.C. on

In one of my previous posts, I discussed the basic requirements for bringing a CPLR 3213 motion for summary judgment in lieu of complaint.  One such requirement (and the one that generates the largest body of case law), is...more

Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP

Defendant’s Unsuccessful About-Face Results in $5 Million Judgment

Litigants arguing that their adversary should be judicially estopped from pursing a particular position in litigation face a relatively high burden to invoke the doctrine successfully.  Two recent decisions from Justice...more

Farrell Fritz, P.C.

Innovation Becomes the Norm: Commercial Division Rules Shape Revised Uniform Rules for the Supreme Court and County Court

Farrell Fritz, P.C. on

The New York Commercial Division was created in 1993 “to test whether it would be possible, by concentrating on commercial litigation, to improve the efficiency with which such matters were addressed by the court and, at the...more

Farrell Fritz, P.C.

Think Before You Speak: Words and Actions Can Bind You Beyond The Terms of a Previously Agreed Upon Subcontract Agreement

Farrell Fritz, P.C. on

In a recent case before Justice Andrea Masley, Corporate Electrical Technologies, Inc. v. Structure Tone, Inc. et al., Plaintiff Corporate Electrical Technologies, Inc. (“CET”), a subcontractor, was hired by Structure Tone,...more

Farrell Fritz, P.C.

Summer Day Camp Derivative Headed to Trial

Farrell Fritz, P.C. on

A recent decision in Greenhaus v. Gersh out of the Commercial Division, Suffolk County, is yet another example.  This time, the business is a summer day camp located on the north shore of Long Island in Huntington, New York....more

Farrell Fritz, P.C.

Litigator's Toolkit: Know the Law, Know the Rules, Know your Judge

Farrell Fritz, P.C. on

We all know that understanding the law is a first step to good lawyering. But understanding what the particular judge assigned to your case likes and dislikes, and her pet peeves is just as important for your success as an...more

Farrell Fritz, P.C.

New York, Not Swiss Law Applies to Lawsuit Over “Stolen” $40M Princie Diamond

Farrell Fritz, P.C. on

In a recent decision by the New York County Commercial Division (Borrok, J.), the Court held that New York law, not Swiss law, applies to a dispute involving the ownership of the storied Princie Diamond – an extremely rare...more

Farrell Fritz, P.C.

Summary Judgment 102: Make Sure Your “Money Instrument” Is In Tune With CPLR 3213

Farrell Fritz, P.C. on

Summary judgment plays an important role in litigation. So important, in fact, that many of our blog posts are devoted to the topic. Last week, my colleague Matthew Donovan discussed the policy against allowing successive...more

Farrell Fritz, P.C.

A Prior Inconsistent Statement Is Not Necessarily Your Road to Judicial Estoppel

Farrell Fritz, P.C. on

You have been engaged in extensive motion practice in the Supreme Court of the State of New York. You learn that your adversary, it appears, has taken a position contrary to the one taken in a prior proceeding. These...more

Farrell Fritz, P.C.

Recovering Lost Profits Is a Fine Art in the Legal World

Farrell Fritz, P.C. on

Perhaps the most important aspect of any case is determining what your damages are. After all, isn’t that generally the point of all our efforts – to try to recover the most amount of money?...more

Farrell Fritz, P.C.

Summary Judgment 101: Movants, Make Sure Your Evidence Is In "Admissible Form"

Farrell Fritz, P.C. on

Most litigators are familiar with the requirement that a summary motion be supported with “evidentiary proof in admissible form” establishing the merits of a cause of action or defense....more

Farrell Fritz, P.C.

Commercial Division Rules May Be Coming to a Non-Commercial Court Near You

Farrell Fritz, P.C. on

For those civil practitioners who don’t regularly practice in the Commercial Division – beware. The Unified Court System’s Advisory Committee on Civil Practice (the “Committee”) has proposed that nine (9) Commercial Division...more

Farrell Fritz, P.C.

Shareholder Oppression Requires More Than Denial of Access to Company Information

Farrell Fritz, P.C. on

The family-owned business at the center of Vaccari v Vaccari, 2018 NY Slip Op 30546(U) [Sup Ct NY County Mar. 28, 2018], decided last month by veteran Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Eileen Bransten, is a classic...more

Farrell Fritz, P.C.

Blue Man Group Member’s Fiduciary Duty Claim Drummed Out of Court

Farrell Fritz, P.C. on

Ian Pai was an early participant in the Blue Man Group (“BMG”). Between 1989 and 1991, he met and began collaborating with the founders of BMG, namely, Chris Wink, Phillip Stanton and Matt Goldman. ...more

Farrell Fritz, P.C.

Rare Partnership Dissolution Decision Applies Deadlock Standard to Dissolution Under Partnership Law

Farrell Fritz, P.C. on

As LLCs have become the dominant form of closely-held business in New York, cases involving dissolution of partnerships have become more and more rare. Section 63 of the Partnership Law is the statute governing judicial...more

Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP

Commercial Division Trial to Address Collateral Call and Dispute Resolution Provisions of ISDA Agreements

In a case with potentially broad implications for participants in the leveraged loan and derivatives markets, Justice Eileen Bransten will conduct a bench trial starting next week in the long-running dispute between a...more

22 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide