The Federal Circuit considered its 35 U.S.C. § 112 enablement case law and found that “the enablement inquiry for claims that include functional requirements”—in this case, claims to antibodies defined by their function—“can...more
Last week, Mylan filed a brief in opposition to Valeant’s petition for rehearing en banc in Valeant Pharms. N. Am. LLC v. Mylan Pharms. Inc., No. 2019-2402. In November, a Federal Circuit panel held that venue in Hatch-Waxman...more
Pfizer’s proposed biosimilar of Amgen’s Epogen® and Johnson & Johnson’s Procrit® (epoetin alfa) is poised to be the first erythropoietin (EPO) biosimilar in the U.S. FDA staff recommended approval of Pfizer’s product as a...more
7/11/2017
/ Amgen ,
Biosimilars ,
Biotechnology ,
BPCIA ,
CGMP ,
FDA Approval ,
Food and Drug Administration (FDA) ,
Hospira ,
Johnson & Johnson ,
Pfizer ,
Pharmaceutical Industry ,
Pharmaceutical Patents
In Ariosa Diagnostics Inc. v. Sequenom Inc., 788 F.3d 1371 (Fed. Cir. 2015), a Federal Circuit panel held that Sequenom Inc.’s prenatal diagnosis patent claims patent ineligible subject matter under the two-step test of Mayo...more
9/10/2015
/ BIA ,
Biotechnology ,
DNA ,
En Banc Review ,
European Patent Office ,
Kappos ,
Mayo v. Prometheus ,
Myriad ,
Myriad-Mayo ,
Patent Infringement ,
Patent Litigation ,
Patent-Eligible Subject Matter ,
Patents ,
Preemption ,
Prometheus ,
SCOTUS ,
Sequenom ,
Trade Secrets ,
WARF