On June 8, 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court decided Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc. v. VIP Products LLC, No. 22-148, holding that (1) when an accused trademark infringer uses another’s trademark to designate the source of its own...more
On March 24, 2022, the U.S. Supreme Court decided Houston Community College System v. Wilson, No. 20-804, concluding that an elected official does not possess an actionable First Amendment retaliation claim arising purely...more
On June 29, 2020, the Supreme Court of the United States decided Agency for International Development, et al. v. Alliance for Open Society International, Inc., et al., No. 19-177, holding that Congress may lawfully condition...more
7/1/2020
/ Constitutional Challenges ,
First Amendment ,
Foreign Affiliates ,
Foreign Aid ,
NGOs ,
Non-Citizens ,
Policies and Procedures ,
Prostitution ,
Public Health ,
Reversal ,
SCOTUS ,
Sex Trafficking ,
The Leadership Act ,
United States Agency for International Development v Alliance for Open Society International Inc
On June 24, 2019, the United States Supreme Court decided Iancu v. Brunetti, No. 18-302, holding that the Lanham Act’s prohibition on registering federal trademarks that are “immoral” or “scandalous” violates the First...more
6/25/2019
/ Appeals ,
Constitutional Challenges ,
First Amendment ,
Free Speech ,
Iancu v. Brunetti ,
Lanham Act ,
Reaffirmation ,
Reversal ,
Scandalous/Immoral Marks ,
SCOTUS ,
Trademark Registration ,
Trademarks ,
USPTO ,
Viewpoint Discrimination
On June 18, 2018, the Supreme Court of the United States decided Gill v. Whitford, No. 16-1161, holding that where voters assert that a state’s legislative districts have been improperly gerrymandered, those voters lack...more
6/20/2018
/ Appeals ,
Article III ,
Constitutional Challenges ,
First Amendment ,
Fourteenth Amendment ,
Gerrymandering ,
Gill v Whitford ,
Injury-in-Fact ,
Political Parties ,
Remand ,
SCOTUS ,
Standing ,
Vacated ,
Voting Rights
On June 14, 2018, the Supreme Court of the United States decided Minnesota Voters Alliance v. Mansky, No. 16-1435, holding that Minnesota’s ban on the wearing of political apparel in the polling place violates the Free Speech...more
6/15/2018
/ Appeals ,
Constitutional Challenges ,
First Amendment ,
Free Speech ,
Minnesota Voters Alliance v Mansky ,
Non-Public Forum ,
Political Apparel Ban ,
Polling Place ,
Reversal ,
SCOTUS ,
Viewpoint Discrimination
On December 8, 2015, the Supreme Court of the United States decided Shapiro v. McManus, No. 14-990, holding that a three-judge district court must be convened to decide a First Amendment challenge to Maryland's 2011 redrawing...more