The California Court of Appeal, Fourth District, Division One, issued the following decision on October 17, 2023:
FCM Investments, LLC v. Grove Pham, LLC, et al., Case No. D080801: Though an agreement to privately...more
The California Court of Appeal, Fourth District, Division One, issued the following published decision...more
The California Supreme Court issued the following decision earlier this week:
Travis et al. v. Brand et al., Case No. S268480: Government Code section 91003(a) gives trial courts discretion to award attorney’s fees to “a...more
The California Supreme Court issued the following decision last week:
Yahoo, Inc. v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA, No. S253593. Yahoo!’s insurer, National Union, refused to indemnify Yahoo! in...more
11/28/2022
/ Advertising Injury ,
CA Supreme Court ,
Commercial General Liability Policies ,
Consumer Privacy Rights ,
Duty to Defend ,
Indemnity Claim ,
Insurance Litigation ,
Putative Class Actions ,
TCPA ,
Text Messages ,
Yahoo!
The California Court of Appeal for the Fourth Appellate District issued the following decisions this week:
Golf & Tennis Pro Shop, Inc. v. The Superior Court of Orange County, No. G060852: The Court of Appeal...more
The California Court of Appeal, Fourth District, Division 3, issued the following decision on September 7:
Garg v. Garg, Case No. G061500: This decision serves, perhaps, as both a warning and a consolation to attorneys...more
The California Supreme Court issued the following decisions last week:
Hoffmann v. Young, et al., Case No. S266003: Under Civil Code section 846, landowners generally owe no duty of care to keep their property safe for...more
9/7/2022
/ Anti-SLAPP ,
Appeals ,
CA Supreme Court ,
Cal Code of Civil Procedure ,
Duty of Care ,
Free Speech ,
Offer-in-Compromise ,
Prejudgment Interest ,
Property Owners ,
Protests ,
Public Interest ,
Section 998 ,
Settlement Agreements ,
Visitors
The California Supreme Court issued the following decisions:
Cam-Carson, LLC v. Carson Reclamation Authority, et al., Case No. B312729: Plaintiff, a commercial real estate developer joint venture, sued the City of Carson...more
The California Supreme Court issued the following decisions this week:
Coast Community College Dist. v. Commission on State Mandates, No. S262663: The Supreme Court addressed whether several community college districts...more
The California Supreme Court issued the following decision on Thursday:
Zolly v. City of Oakland, No. S262634: In a case involving the California Constitution’s taxpayer approval requirements for local taxes, the...more
The California Supreme Court issued the following decisions:
County of Butte v. Department of Water Resources, et al., No. S258574: California’s Department of Water Resources (DWR) operates the “Oroville Facilities,” an...more
8/8/2022
/ Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) ,
CA Supreme Court ,
CEQA ,
Department of Water Resources ,
Disability ,
Environmental Impact Report (EIR) ,
Federal Power Act ,
Licensing Rules ,
Public Schools ,
Unruh Civil Rights Act ,
Utilities Sector ,
Water
We are spotlighting a published California Court of Appeal decision on rehearing for its analysis on contract and fraud claims arising out of a real estate transaction.
The California Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate...more
Siry Investment, L.P. v. Farkhondehpour, No. S262081: The Supreme Court resolved two issues: whether (1) a party in default has standing to file a motion for a new trial alleging legal error in the calculation of damages, and...more
While not from the California Supreme Court, we are reporting on a decision from the California Court of Appeal because of its importance to myriad COVID-19 insurance coverage actions currently being litigated in California. ...more
Grande v. Eisenhower Medical Center, No. S261247: In this case, a staffing agency arranged for a nurse to work at a hospital. The nurse sued the staffing agency for violating the Labor Code and Unfair Competition Law but did...more