Latest Publications

Share:

CRISPR Interference Parties Propose Motions

The parties (University of California/Berkeley, the University of Vienna, and Emmanuelle Charpentier, Junior Party, and The Broad Institute, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and Harvard University, Senior Party) to the...more

Dr. Falk Pharma GmbH v. Generico, LLC (Fed. Cir. 2019) - July 2019

The interplay (or perhaps utilization) of inter partes review (IPR) in ANDA litigation was illustrated by the Federal Circuit in last month's Dr. Falk Pharma GmbH v. Generico, LLC nonprecedential decision....more

The Proper Role of the Federal Circuit

There has been much commentary, some of it incendiary, regarding whether the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit is fulfilling its responsibilities under its enabling statute or failing to provide the proper pro-patent...more

Indivior Inc. v. Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, S.A. (Fed. Cir. 2019)

Last month, the Federal Circuit affirmed decisions from four separate trials in the District of Delaware involving seven different defendants regarding validity and infringement of patents directed to an opioid addiction...more

Mayne Pharma Int'l v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. (Fed. Cir. 2019)

The Federal Circuit continued its explication of the circumstances wherein an inter partes review petition is time-barred under 35 U.S.C. § 315(b) in Mayne Pharma Int'l v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., decided earlier this...more

Sigma-Aldrich Wants Its Piece of CRISPR Pie

On Friday, July 19, 2019, Sigma-Aldrich filed a self-described "extraordinary" petition to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (under 37 C.F.R. §§ 1.181-1.183) and the Chief Judge of the PTAB (under 37 C.F.R....more

Qui Tam Action Filed under False Claims Act over Certain Prescription Drug Prices

Those with moderate memories may recall that there was a spate of qui tam actions several years ago for false marking of patented articles, aimed at manufacturers who had neglected to remove patent marking from their products...more

UCB, Inc. v. Watson Laboratories Inc. (Fed. Cir. 2019)

The doctrine of equivalents, a Supreme Court-created patent doctrine of vintage similar to inequitable conduct, arose in Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co., 339 U.S. 605 (1950) (an uncharacteristically...more

New CRISPR Interference: The Details

On June 24th, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office declared an interference (No. 106,115) between patents and applications owned by the Regents of the University of California, the University of Vienna, and Emmanuelle...more

7/9/2019  /  CRISPR , Patent Applications , Patents , USPTO

CRISPR Battle Joined Again

On June 24th, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office declared an interference between patents (and an application) assigned to the Broad Institute (and other institutions) and applications assigned to the University of...more

Supreme Court Strikes Down Ban on "Immoral and Scandalous" Trademarks

On Monday, the U.S. Supreme Court issued an opinion in Iancu v. Brunetti, No. 18-302, finding that the Lanham Act prohibition against registration of scandalous or immoral trademarks violates the First Amendment of the U.S....more

Biotech Prospects for Patent Reform

With great fanfare (and a seeming exercise of appropriate diligence), Senators Thom Tillis (R-NC) and Chris Coons (D-DE), chair and ranking member of the Intellectual Property Subcommittee of the Senate Judiciary committee,...more

Selection for Facial Features in Domestic Dogs: The Evolution of Cuteness

The coming of the genomic age has made popular genetic explanations of traits (behavioral as well as structural) in plants, animals, and humans. Because of their importance (economically, historically, and emotionally), dogs...more

FTC to the Rescue Regarding High Drug Prices and Patents

On May 9th, Senators John Corbyn (R-TX) and Richard Blumenthal (D-CT), joined by co-sponsors Shelley Moore Capito (R-WV), Patty Murray (D-WA), Rick Scott (R-FL), John Kennedy (R-LA), and Josh Hawley (R-MO), introduced a bill,...more

Regents of the University of Minnesota v. LSI Corp. (Fed. Cir. 2019)

The Federal Circuit handed down its decision in Regents of the University of Minnesota v. LSI Corp. on Friday, and perhaps not surprisingly (in view of its decision last summer in Saint Regis Mohawk Tribe v. Mylan...more

Even More Ill-Conceived Remedies from Congress Regarding Prescription Drug Costs

"Solving" the problem of high prescription drug prices has been on the minds of our representatives in Congress lately, and the desire to "do something" about it has reached the point that just doing something (or being...more

Top 50 NIH-Funded Research Institutions FY2019

Genetic Engineering News published the results of a study on Monday entitled "Top 50 NIH-Funded Institutions of 2019."  The report sets forth the context of these expenditures, with the Trump administration proposing large...more

ACLU (Predictably) Opposes Patent Subject Matter Eligibility Proposal

It is perhaps not surprising that several medical groups, as well as other organizations with little regard for the patent system, and their legal accomplice, the American Civil Liberties Union, would oppose the recent...more

Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. Albrecht (2019)

Last week, in Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. Albrecht, the Supreme Court continued its explication of the balance between state law tort liability that can be imposed on drug makers and the extent to which this liability can be...more

Senate Proposal for Section 101 Reform: Effect on Biotech/Pharma Inventions

The parlous state of patent law as applied to biotechnology (and to a slightly lesser extent, pharmaceuticals) generally over the past several years has been thoroughly explicated, and the recalcitrance engendered by stare...more

Nuvo Pharmaceuticals (Ireland) Designated Activity Co. v. Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Inc. (Fed. Cir. 2019)

There are provisions and interpretations of U.S. patent law that can be in tension depending on the circumstances under which they are argued, whether before an Examiner or during litigation.  One of these is the dichotomy...more

Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp. v. West-Ward Pharmaceuticals Int'l (Fed. Cir. 2019)

The Federal Circuit exhibited the current status of its obviousness jurisprudence in affirming the District Court's determination that the asserted claims of U.S. Patent No. 8,410,131 were obvious in a decision handed down...more

FDA Issues Another Draft Guidance Regarding Biosimilar Interchangeability

Late last week, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration issued a final version of its "Guidance for Industry," entitled "Considerations in Demonstrating Interchangeability With a Reference Product" regarding the as-yet...more

Amgen Inc. v. Sandoz Inc. (Fed. Cir. 2019)

The latest chapter in the long-running dispute between Amgen and Sandoz over Sandoz's Zarxio® biosimilar to Amgen's Neupogen® biologic drug came to a close last week when the Federal Circuit affirmed grant of summary judgment...more

Amarin Pharma, Inc. v. ITC (Fed. Cir. 2019)

The International Trade Commission, although having limited jurisdiction, can be a very powerful ally to U.S. industries facing foreign competition. The Commission's power to interdict importation of infringing articles can...more

1,002 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 41

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide