News & Analysis as of

§ 287 Vacated Patent Litigation

Mintz - Intellectual Property Viewpoints

Federal Circuit: Licensees’ Failure to Mark Eliminates Entitlement to Pre-Suit Damages

Recently, in Packet Intelligence LLC v. NetScout Sys., Inc., No 19-2041 (July 14, 2020), the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed a jury verdict of $3.5 million in pre-suit damages and vacated the trial court’s...more

Knobbe Martens

Enjoining Speech and the Right to Allege Patent Infringement

Knobbe Martens on

MYCO INDUSTRIES, INC. v. BLEPHEX, LLC - Before Newman, O’Malley, and Taranto. Appeal from the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan - Summary: Enjoining a patentee from making statements about...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Arctic Cat Inc. v. Bombardier Recreational Products Inc. (Fed. Cir. 2020)

The patent marking statute, codified at 35 U.S.C. § 287(a) appears straightforward: Patentees, and persons making, offering for sale, or selling within the United States any patented article for or under them, or importing...more

Knobbe Martens

Pre-Complaint Damages for Willful Infringement Sunk by Failure to Comply With Marking Statute

Knobbe Martens on

Arctic Cat Inc. v. Bombardier Recreational Prods. Inc. Before Lourie, Moore, and Stoll. Appeal from the Southern District of Florida. Summary: To recover pre-complaint damages for infringement after sales of unmarked...more

4 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide