News & Analysis as of

Abuse of Process Patent Trial and Appeal Board

Smart & Biggar

Federal Court permits counterclaim as of right against non-asserted patent claims in s. 6(1) PMNOC actions

Smart & Biggar on

On February 17, 2023, the Federal Court ruled that Sandoz and Sun Pharma may counterclaim as of right against non-asserted patent claims in separate actions pursuant to the Patented Medicines (Notice of Compliance)...more

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP

USPTO Director Issues Sua Sponte Precedential Decision Addressing Abuse of IPR Process

In a precedential 52-page sua sponte decision, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) Director Katherine Vidal addressed several issues of first impression relating to sanctionable misconduct in inter partes...more

Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, P.C.

PTAB Sanctions Non-Practicing Entity for Seeking to Abuse the IPR Process in Order to Extort Money

Last month, in OpenSky Industries v. VLSI Technology LLC, IPR2021-01064 (Oct. 4, 2022), the Director of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) issued a precedential decision regarding abuse of process. The decision...more

Jones Day

OpenSky – Director Finds Abuse Of Process

Jones Day on

In OpenSky Industries, LLC v. VLSI Technology LLC, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property, Katherine Vidal, issued a precedential decision regarding OpenSky’s violation of the Director’s express order and...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

Several hedge fund-linked IPR Petitions Instituted: PTAB Finds No Abuse of Process

Foley & Lardner LLP on

Following a string of denials, the PTAB has recently instituted IPR against several pharmaceutical patents where the petitions were filed by entities linked to hedge funds. Prior to these recent institution decisions, there...more

Fish & Richardson

Kyle Bass Group Gets PTAB To Review 2 Celgene Patents

Fish & Richardson on

Yesterday the PTAB issued institution decisions in five Bass IPR petitions—denying institution of IPR2015-01086 against Biogen and instituting four IPR petitions against Celgene (IRP2015-01092, 01096, 01102, and 01103)....more

Morrison & Foerster LLP

MoFo IP Newsletter - October 2015

The Survey Says: Tiffany Is Not Generic for A Ring Setting - Last month, the Southern District of New York granted summary judgment to Tiffany & Co. on its trademark infringement claim against Costco Wholesale...more

Morrison & Foerster LLP

A Win for Kyle Bass’s Hedge Fund as the PTAB Dismisses Celgene’s Sanctions Motions

The Patent Trial and Appeals Board (PTAB) dismissed Celgene Corporation’s (“Celgene”) motions for sanctions against the Coalition for Affordable Drugs (“the Coalition”). As we previously reported, the Coalition is an...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

PTAB Refuses To Sanction Kyle Bass

Foley & Lardner LLP on

Many pharmaceutical companies have complained about the IPR petitions filed by Kyle Bass and the Coalition for Affordable Drugs against Orange Book-listed patents covering approved pharmaceutical products, but Celgene Corp....more

Fish & Richardson

PTAB Denies Sanctions Against Bass

Fish & Richardson on

On Friday September 25, the PTAB issued its decision on Celgene’s sanctions motions seeking dismissal of five IPRs filed by Kyle Bass and his hedge fund Coalition for Affordable Drugs VI. In June, Celgene filed sanctions...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

PTAB Requests Additional Briefing on Hedge Fund IPR Questions: A Decision May Be Near

Foley & Lardner LLP on

On Sept. 1, 2015, the PTAB issued an order in Coalition for Affordable Drugs (CFAD) v. NPS Pharmaceuticals for the parties to brief the following questions in 7 business days...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

Kyle Bass Loses Round 1 of IPR Attack Against Pharma/Biotech Patents

Foley & Lardner LLP on

On August 24, 2015, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) declined institution of two petitions filed by Coalition For Affordable Drugs for Inter Partes Reviews (IPRs) of Acorda’s patents (U.S. Patent Nos: 8,007,826,...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

PTAB Denies Institution of Kyle Bass's Ampyra Patent Challenge

Foley & Lardner LLP on

The USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) has put an end to Kyle Bass’s Ampyra patent challenge, by denying institution of Inter Partes Review (IPR) proceedings. While many were hoping the PTAB would render a decision...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

PTAB Denies Inter Partes Review Petitions Against Two Acorda Patents

One of the statistics gleaned from Director Michelle Lee's recent blog on the post-issuance review provisions of the America Invents Act is that only 42% of inter partes review petitions have been granted over the past three...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

Will New PTAB Rules Impact IPRs Filed By Kyle Bass Hedge Fund?

Foley & Lardner LLP on

On August 19th, the USPTO released a new set of proposed rules related to post-grant proceedings before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB). Among the many offered rules was the addition of a “Rule 11-type certification”...more

Fish & Richardson

Bass Opposes Sanctions and Defends His Actions at the PTAB

Fish & Richardson on

On July 28, 2015, Celgene filed a motion for sanctions in IPR Nos. 2015-01092 and 2015-01103, proceedings challenging the validity of Celgene patents covering Thalomid®, Revlimid® and Pomalyst®. Celgene specifically...more

Morrison & Foerster LLP

PTAB to Consider Motion for “Abuse of Process” Sanctions Against Kyle Bass Hedge Fund IPR Petition

In a recent order, the Patent Trial and Appeals Board (PTAB) indicated that it will consider a motion for sanctions based on a claim of “abuse of process” in Inter Partes Review (IPR) proceedings filed by the Coalition for...more

17 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide