News & Analysis as of

Action to Quiet Title

Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates & Woodyard,...

Riparian Rights/Piers and Docks: Federal Court Addresses Ownership of Mississippi River Submerged Waterbed

Co-Author Jesse Long The United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin (“Court”) addressed in an August 22nd Opinion a riparian rights issue. See Clott et al., v. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 2024 WL...more

McGlinchey Stafford

Litigation Byte (August Edition)

McGlinchey Stafford on

The Litigation Byte is the new name and format for McGlinchey’s Commercial Law Bulletin. Our new format reflects McGlinchey’s national coverage and our expanded footprint while still serving up the digestible, insightful...more

Womble Bond Dickinson

Navigating the Complexities of Tax Lien Investments in Georgia: Time Horizons, Legal Challenges, and Strategies for Success

Womble Bond Dickinson on

Obtaining a return on a tax lien investment can have a long time horizon in Georgia. After purchasing a tax lien, an investor must wait at least a year before foreclosing the right of redemption of the tax debtor, taking...more

McGlinchey Stafford

Under FAPA: Dismissal of Prior Foreclosure for Lack of Standing Does Not Estop Lender

McGlinchey Stafford on

On July 31, 2024, the New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division: Second Department affirmed the dismissal of a quiet title action, which sought to discharge a mortgage as time-barred under the Foreclosure Abuse Prevention...more

Kaufman & Canoles

Court of Appeals of Virginia Holds Possession Under Mistaken Belief Can Establish the Requisite Hostile Possession for a Claim of...

Kaufman & Canoles on

Yesterday, the Court of Appeals of Virginia issued an important decision regarding two often troubling elements under Virginia law regarding proving a claim of adverse possession....more

Rivkin Radler LLP

The Title Reporter: A Legal Update for the Title Insurance Industry -Winter 2024

Rivkin Radler LLP on

Here is what we cover in this issue of Title Insurance Update Winter 2024: •The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, affirming a decision by the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida, has ruled...more

Gray Reed

Court Addresses Questions in Trespass to Try Title/Adverse Possession Suit

Gray Reed on

Fletcher v. Merritt resulted in several rulings on the proof required to prevail in a property dispute. Merritt filed a trespass to try title suit (actually a quiet title, which the court construed as TTT) against Fletcher...more

Patton Sullivan Brodehl LLP

Relying on a Void Quiet Title Judgment — Redux

In May 2021, Money and Dirt covered a case published by California’s Second Appellate District — Tsasu LLC v. U.S. Bank Trust, N.A. — holding that under Code of Civil Procedure section 764.060 (part of California’s Quiet...more

Rivkin Radler LLP

The Title Reporter – Summer 2023

Rivkin Radler LLP on

Here is what we cover in this issue of The Title Reporter: A Legal Update for the Title Insurance Industry: •A trial court in New York has dismissed a negligence action against a title company brought by a developer, ruling...more

Epstein Becker & Green

Jurisdictional or Nonjurisdictional? That Is the Question: SCOTUS Today

Epstein Becker & Green on

The Supreme Court issued a single opinion yesterday. Wilkins v. United States concerns a property rights dispute between the federal government and two owners of land near the Bitterroot National Forest in rural Montana to...more

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP

Supreme Court Decides Wilkins, et al. v. United States

On March 28, 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court decided Wilkins, et al. v. United States, No. 21-1164, holding that the Quiet Title Act’s 12-year limitation period is a “nonjurisdictional claims-processing rule” that does not...more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

The Supreme Court Update - March 28, 2023

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

Today, the Supreme Court of the United States issued one decision: Wilkins v. United States, No. 21-1164: This case considered the question of whether the 12-year statute of limitations in the Quiet Title Act is...more

Rivkin Radler LLP

The Title Reporter — Spring 2023

Rivkin Radler LLP on

Here is what we cover in this issue of The Title Reporter: A Legal Update for the Title Insurance Industry: •An appellate court in Arkansas, affirming a trial court’s decision, has ruled that a title insurer had properly...more

Patton Sullivan Brodehl LLP

Sometimes Real Property Rights Can be Adjudicated in a Criminal Case Where the Property Owner is Not Even a Party

Owners of real property generally understand that their property rights can be impacted by litigation in which they are a party. However, what’s less clear, but perhaps equally important to understand and guard against, is...more

Roetzel & Andress

One Less Way for Ohio Landowners to Challenge Royalty Severances

Roetzel & Andress on

On February 15, 2022, the Ohio Supreme Court issued a significant decision in Peppertree Farms, L.L.C. v. Thonen establishing that, unless expressly stated otherwise, an oil and gas royalty interest retained in a deed...more

Rivkin Radler LLP

The Title Reporter — Fall 2021

Rivkin Radler LLP on

Here is what we cover in this issue of The Title Reporter: A Legal Update for the Title Insurance Industry: •An appellate court in California has ruled that the state’s Quiet Title Act insulated a third party from the...more

Patton Sullivan Brodehl LLP

Deed Language Defines the Scope of a Reserved Easement

Under California law, a grant deed is generally understood to transfer the entire fee title interest in real property, unless it expressly states otherwise.  (See, e.g., Civil Code sections 1105 and 1113.) If the seller wants...more

Perkins Coie

Sovereign Immunity Barred Quiet Title Suit Against Indian Tribe

Perkins Coie on

The First Appellate District held that tribal sovereign immunity bars a quiet title action to establish a public easement for coastal access on property owned by an Indian tribe. Self v. Cher-Ae Heights Indian Community, 60...more

Rivkin Radler LLP

The Title Reporter — Summer 2021

Rivkin Radler LLP on

Here is what we cover in this issue of The Title Reporter: A Legal Update for the Title Insurance Industry: •An appellate court in New York has ruled that a title insurance policy excluded coverage for a “Declaration and...more

Gray Reed

Try Title vs. Quieting Title: What’s the difference?

Gray Reed on

If you aren’t quite sure about the difference between trespass to try title and suit to quiet title, Lockhart as Tr. of Lockhart Fam. Bypass Tr. v. Chisos Mins., LLC  explains. ...more

Patton Sullivan Brodehl LLP

Relying on a Void Quiet Title Judgment

Under California’s Quiet Title Act, a third party who acts in reliance on a quiet title judgment retains its property rights even if that quiet title judgment is later declared void as long as the third party qualifies as a...more

Patton Sullivan Brodehl LLP

Quieting Title After a Failed Deed in Contemplation of Marriage

Claims for quieting title to real property can be governed by different statutes of limitations periods. But a common issue in quiet title cases is when the statute of limitations period starts running....more

K&L Gates LLP

Class Dismissed: Ohio Court Strikes Class Action Allegations in a Quiet Title Dispute

K&L Gates LLP on

As drilling activity and production in the Appalachian region stabilized (and even began to move upward) at the end of 2020, class actions continue to be used in creative ways by plaintiffs raising a variety of claims and...more

Bricker Graydon LLP

Ohio Supreme Court holds that both the MTA and DMA apply to mineral interests in West v. Bode

Bricker Graydon LLP on

Ohio oil and gas stakeholders received another landmark decision from the Ohio Supreme Court in West v. Bode, 2020 — N.E.3d — 2020 WL 7049820 2020-Ohio-5473. Specifically, the Court held that both the Marketable Title Act...more

Snell & Wilmer

Statute of Limitations Bars Lender’s Subsequent Action to Quiet Title Against Junior Lienholder Mistakenly Omitted from Initial...

Snell & Wilmer on

A recently issued opinion by the Court of Appeal, Fifth Appellate District tells a cautionary tale regarding a lender’s failure to name a junior lienholder in its initial judicial foreclosure action. In Cathleen Robin v....more

76 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 4

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide