News & Analysis as of

Administrative Agencies Appointments Clause

WilmerHale

Jarkesy Case Upends SEC Tribunal

WilmerHale on

On May 18, 2022, the US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit issued its decision in Jarkesy v. SEC, vacating a Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) decision in an enforcement action brought as an administrative...more

Carlton Fields

SEC Proceedings Face Uncertainty After Supreme Court Holds ALJs Unconstitutional

Carlton Fields on

After much anticipation, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled on the constitutionality of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC or Commission) Administrative Law Judges (ALJs)....more

Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP

ALJs Could Get Political With New Executive Order

The new executive order (EO) granting agency chiefs the power to hire administrative law judges (ALJs) according to their own standards—and eliminating the exam and competitive hiring process formerly in place—could turn the...more

Fisher Phillips

OSHA, Too? Will OSHA Citations Also Be Invalidated in the Wake of the Jones Brothers Case?

Fisher Phillips on

After the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals’ decision in Jones Brothers, Inc. v. Sec’y of Labor, citations upheld by administrative law judges within the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission (“FMSHRC”) may be...more

Fisher Phillips

MSHA Citations Upheld by Administrative Law Judges Before April 3, 2018 May Be Invalid

Fisher Phillips on

Over the last few years, there has been debate regarding whether ALJs are “inferior officers” under the Appointments Clause of the Constitution. This provision provides that officers, including inferior officers, may only be...more

Polsinelli

Lack of Presidential Appointment May Invalidate ALJ Decisions

Polsinelli on

In one of its last opinions of the term, the U.S. Supreme Court held in Lucia v. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on June 21, 2018, that administrative law judges (ALJs) are officers of the United States, not...more

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP

3 Key Defense Arguments For Post-Lucia SEC Proceedings

Orrick's Andrew Morris and Ben Aiken co-authored an article for Law360 in which they identify three of the most significant defense arguments for respondents in SEC administrative actions in light of the Supreme Court's...more

Carlton Fields

Supreme Court Set to Rule on Constitutionality of SEC’s ALJs

Carlton Fields on

In April, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral argument in Lucia v. SEC to resolve the federal circuit court split on whether the SEC’s administrative law judges (ALJs) are "inferior officers" of the United States who must be...more

Vedder Price

SEC Administrative Law Judges: Key Takeaways and Lingering Questions from Lucia v. SEC

Vedder Price on

On June 21, 2018, the United States Supreme Court resolved a circuit split on the question of whether administrative law judges (“ALJs”) of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC” or the “Commission”) qualify as...more

Ballard Spahr LLP

What does the Supreme Court’s Lucia decision mean for the CFPB and federal banking agencies?

Ballard Spahr LLP on

In its June 21 decision in Lucia v. Securities & Exchange Commission, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that administrative law judges (ALJs) used by the SEC are “Officers of the United States” under the Appointments Clause in...more

K&L Gates LLP

Supreme Court Offers Others a Chance for a Second Bite at the Apple in Federal Administrative Adjudication Proceedings – But the...

K&L Gates LLP on

On June 21, 2018 the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Lucia et al. v. Securities and Exchange Commission, [1] that the appointment of certain administrative law judges (“ALJs”) was unconstitutional, and that those with matters...more

Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP

Supreme Court Rules the SEC’s Procedure for Appointing Administrative Law Judges Violates the Constitution’s Appointments Clause

On June 21, 2018, the Supreme Court in Raymond J. Lucia, et al. v. SEC, held that the SEC’s administrative law judges are “Officers of the United States” whose appointment must comport with the requirements of the...more

Tonkon Torp LLP

Supreme Court Throws Out SEC Administrative Law Judge Process

Tonkon Torp LLP on

On June 21, 2018, the Supreme Court of the United States invalidated the process that the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") had been using to appoint administrative law judges. Staff from the SEC had selected...more

Dechert LLP

Supreme Court Holds That SEC’s Administrative Law Judges Were Unconstitutionally Appointed

Dechert LLP on

The U.S. Supreme Court recently held, in Lucia v. SEC,1 that Administrative Law Judges (ALJs) for the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC or Commission) are officers of the United States who must be appointed...more

Morrison & Foerster LLP

Lucia Leaves Many Important Questions Unanswered

In Lucia v. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, Justice Elena Kagan, writing for a six-justice majority, presents the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision as both narrow and uncomplicated. “The sole question” the court chose to...more

Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP

SCOTUS Overturns SEC Judge Appointments: What You Need to Know

Many cases involving federal regulatory law are largely decided by judges appointed by the staffs of federal agencies—administrative law judges (ALJs). In a case closely watched for its securities and white-collar crime...more

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP

Government Agencies Face Uncertainty After Supreme Court Rules That SEC ALJs Must Be Appointed

• SEC ALJs are “Officers of the United States” within the meaning of the Appointments Clause and therefore must be appointed directly by the SEC. The Court’s decision may permit litigants in prior and pending administrative...more

Morgan Lewis

Supreme Court Provides One Answer about SEC Administrative Law Judges, but Leaves Many Questions

Morgan Lewis on

On June 21, in Lucia v. Securities and Exchange Commission, the US Supreme Court held that administrative law judges of the US Securities and Exchange Commission are not mere federal employees but qualify as “Officers of the...more

Ballard Spahr LLP

Three amicus briefs in support of President Trump and Mick Mulvaney filed in English appeal

Ballard Spahr LLP on

Three amicus briefs have been filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit in support of President Trump and Mick Mulvaney, who are asking the D.C. Circuit to affirm the district court’s decision denying Leandra...more

Ballard Spahr LLP

District court stays proceedings pending outcome of English preliminary injunction appeal; English files opening appeal brief

Ballard Spahr LLP on

On January 30, 2018, the federal district court hearing Leandra English’s action seeking a declaration that she is the lawful Acting CFPB Director granted the parties joint motion to stay further proceedings pending a...more

Ballard Spahr LLP

English files emergency motion for expedited appeal

Ballard Spahr LLP on

Leandra English has filed an emergency motion with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D. C. Circuit requesting expedited briefing and oral argument in her appeal from the district court’s denial of her preliminary injunction...more

Ballard Spahr LLP

English files response to DOJ opposition to preliminary injunction motion

Ballard Spahr LLP on

Leandra English filed a response to the DOJ’s opposition to her motion for a preliminary injunction in her action seeking a declaration that she, rather than Mick Mulvaney, has the legal right to serve as CFPB Acting...more

Ballard Spahr LLP

DOJ files opposition to English’s preliminary injunction motion

Ballard Spahr LLP on

The DOJ has filed its opposition to Leandra English’s motion for a preliminary injunction in her action seeking a declaration that she, rather than Mick Mulvaney, has the legal right to serve as CFPB Acting Director....more

23 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide